splotchman Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 Before this week, he was the #18 WR in my PPR league. Steve Johnson just went off for 11-145, so he'll clearly be Top 15 after this week. After appearing to be a Red Zone stud for weeks, now Fitz appears to look for him all day long as a possession WR. He seems now to me to be a solid WR2, especially if the matchup is right like this week vs. Detroit. Are any Huddlers now starting Mr. Johnson regardless of matchup? Or is a WR2 designation too much? Discuss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buddahj Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 I am as a WR3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Furd Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 Unless you havethe mother of all WR corps, you have to start him. Solid # 2 for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 since week 3 he is top 5 in one of my leagues Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratesownninjas Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 Size+Smooth Redzone moves+Solid hands=awesomeness. I'm rolling him out every week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorcher Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 I think he is consistent enough to where a bad game would be considered an off game. He is a must start for me in 2 ppr leagues, and in the other where he was the 13th wr I traded him for Tamme. He's been a great pick up for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 I'm starting him over Fitzgerald ... starting Mike Williams (TB), Steve Johnson, Mike Wallace I may have to put Fitzgerald back in my lineup and go with a one RB / four WR set. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pratts Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 I'm starting him over Fitzgerald ... I still don't quite get how I got him so easily in CORE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 I still don't quite get how I got him so easily in CORE. I don't want to talk about CORE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackets77 Posted November 10, 2010 Share Posted November 10, 2010 Would you start him this week? here is my WRs and the rest of my team.. WR: AJ, CJ, S.Smith (nyg), Steve Johnson, N. Washinton RB: McCoy, Forte, T.Jones,Torain, K.Williams TE: Witten QB: Ryan, Stafford(will be dropped) DST: Giants I usually start AJ and CJ as my WRs, and start Smith as the flex....Johnson is making a damn good case to take that over..any thoughts? Can I possibly bench any of my WRs for Johnson? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizards Posted November 10, 2010 Share Posted November 10, 2010 Have Steve Smith(Giants), Randy Moss, Desean Jackson and Steve Johnson....going to start him this week(3 WR start) and every week, even when I can only start 2 WR's as McFadden returns next week and gets the flex position.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onbrake Posted November 10, 2010 Share Posted November 10, 2010 As WR3 he is a must start as a WR2 he is a must start this week only.He is a low end 2 high end 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted November 10, 2010 Share Posted November 10, 2010 (edited) Would you start him this week? here is my WRs and the rest of my team.. WR: AJ, CJ, S.Smith (nyg), Steve Johnson, N. Washinton RB: McCoy, Forte, T.Jones,Torain, K.Williams TE: Witten QB: Ryan, Stafford(will be dropped) DST: Giants I usually start AJ and CJ as my WRs, and start Smith as the flex....Johnson is making a damn good case to take that over..any thoughts? Can I possibly bench any of my WRs for Johnson? WDIS question. Take this to the advice forum. Edited November 10, 2010 by Big John Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReturnToSender Posted November 10, 2010 Share Posted November 10, 2010 Traded Randy Moss early, grabbed Johnson off the wire, rolling with TO (for Moss) Johnson and Maclin, with James Jones on a bye. I feel good about those WRs going forward! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Furd Posted November 10, 2010 Share Posted November 10, 2010 (edited) As WR3 he is a must start as a WR2 he is a must start this week only.He is a low end 2 high end 3. Really? The guy is a top 10 WR in probably every scoring format. As somebody pointed out, throw out the first 2 weeks, he is top 5. Are there really 24 guys that you would start in front of him? The more that i think about it, the more I think that this guy is a WR1. Edited November 10, 2010 by Furd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearBroncos Posted November 10, 2010 Share Posted November 10, 2010 Steve Johnson is an absolute solid WR2 and could even be considered a WR1 with the recent injury to Perrish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearBroncos Posted November 10, 2010 Share Posted November 10, 2010 As WR3 he is a must start as a WR2 he is a must start this week only.He is a low end 2 high end 3. He's averaging 12 points per game in my league (only due to Trent Edwards not throwing to him in the first 2 weeks)and that should increase with the recent season ending injury to Perrish. To call him a low end 2 or high end 3 makes absolutely no sense. In nearly all formats this receiver is a solid WR2 / low WR1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajfalcone Posted November 10, 2010 Share Posted November 10, 2010 starting him over Roddy White. Just because of short week/injury and Johnson is playing lights out right now. I cant see Roddy posting 100 yrds this game. I would have to hold my breath and hope Roddy even posts decent stats this week. Johnson is almost a sure thing right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajfalcone Posted November 10, 2010 Share Posted November 10, 2010 He's averaging 12 points per game in my league (only due to Trent Edwards not throwing to him in the first 2 weeks)and that should increase with the recent season ending injury to Perrish. To call him a low end 2 or high end 3 makes absolutely no sense. In nearly all formats this receiver is a solid WR2 / low WR1. I dont get how hes a low WR1 when posting better numbers then A.J/ MegaTron/Colston/Jennings/Boldin/Maclin on and on.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearBroncos Posted November 10, 2010 Share Posted November 10, 2010 I dont get how hes a low WR1 when posting better numbers then A.J/ MegaTron/Colston/Jennings/Boldin/Maclin on and on.... I can't argue that, really. I'm inclined to agree with you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.