keggerz Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 No doubt that McNabb will have a new home next year but where will that home be? My guess: He ends up a Viking but I wouldn't be surprised to see him in a, get this, Bengals uniform Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tazinib1 Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 Arizona Cardinals Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ttwarrior4 Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 c palmer to seatle or washington?? Carolina , arizona, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theprofessor Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 c palmer to seatle or washington?? Carolina , arizona, Seattle already has a weak armed, older QB that makes mistakes at crucial times? He won't show up in Seattle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpholmes Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 (edited) Minnesota Arizona Carolina Oakland ETA: Don't see him in Cinncy - T.O. earned himself another year in a Bengals uniform, and can't see the organization jeopardizing his production by potentially igniting an old feud. Edited December 23, 2010 by kpholmes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frenzal rhomb Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 oh god - oakland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbf2 Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 Why would McNabb go to Oakland, Campbell and Gradkowski are both way better than him at this point Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpholmes Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 (edited) Why would McNabb go to Oakland, Campbell and Gradkowski are both way better than him at this point Right, because their ongoing QB Carousal is indicative that both Al Davis and Tom Cable are completely sold on both? It all comes back to Al Davis and how he does things. McNabb is the kind of quarterback that has ALWAYS been appealing to Al: the experienced, old veteran that has been cast off from other franchises, looking to make one last run at a Superbowl before hanging up the cleats for good, can make things happen through the air and isn't afraid to throw the ball. Trust me when I say that Al looks at Donovan at this point in his career and thinks he looks like a Raider. The Raiders have absolutely no obligation to either of their current quarterbacks: Gradkowski is an unrestricted free agent, and the Raiders gave almost nothing to obtain Campbell. You better believe it's more than possible McNabb could be in the Silver and Black come August. If that were to happen, Al would re-sign Gradkowski for top QB2 dollar (He's got a Fargas-Esq man crush on him) and Campbell would be the odd man out. Edited December 23, 2010 by kpholmes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boltnlava Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 Arizona makes a good case for him I think. Fitz needs a QB not a thrower. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CurlyDumps Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 (edited) Las Vegas Locomotives. Srsly though - what about Carolina? Would they start Luck if they draft him? With the rookie trend lately a la Bradford, Ryan, Sanchez, McCoy. Or would they want to bring in a vet for a year to mentor Luck? Edited December 23, 2010 by CurlyDumps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring Back Pat!!! Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 San Francisco 49ers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Pimp Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 Las Vegas Locomotives. Srsly though - what about Carolina? Would they start Luck if they draft him? With the rookie trend lately a la Bradford, Ryan, Sanchez, McCoy. Or would they want to bring in a vet for a year to mentor Luck? I don't see McNabb going to a place where he is there for 1 year to groom a rookie and then move on again. My guess is Arizona where he can be the guy for 2-3 years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 San Francisco 49ers Yep. Had the 49ers gotten him this year, they would have won the division easily...no question that McNabb, with a solid running game behind him, would have done significantly better than the disaster that was Alex/Troy Smith. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brentastic Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 Are some of you guys really saying that McNabb has a weak arm? He's one of the best deep ball passers in the NFL - he can't throw the short routes accurately but he sure throws a nice deep ball. As for the question? I'd say either Arizona or Minnesota - both make a lot of sense but I'm leaning toward the Viqueens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbpfan1231 Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 Are some of you guys really saying that McNabb has a weak arm? He's one of the best deep ball passers in the NFL - he can't throw the short routes accurately but he sure throws a nice deep ball. As for the question? I'd say either Arizona or Minnesota - both make a lot of sense but I'm leaning toward the Viqueens. I don't get why people say the Vikings? They tried the old QB and it has not worked out. I would love to see McNabb in a Viking uniform but I don't think that is a good move for the Vikes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brentastic Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 (edited) I don't get why people say the Vikings? They tried the old QB and it has not worked out. I would love to see McNabb in a Viking uniform but I don't think that is a good move for the Vikes. Unless there is a better/younger QB that will be a F.A - I think they have to go with McNabb. He's older, yes, but not nearly as old as Favre. McNabb should have a good 2-4 years left in the tank. QBs these days are playing well into their late 30s and McNabb just turned 34 this season. I'd say he has at least 3 good years left. Edited December 23, 2010 by Brentastic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rattsass Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 Unless there is a better/younger QB that will be a F.A - I think they have to go with McNabb. He's older, yes, but not nearly as old as Favre. McNabb should have a good 2-4 years left in the tank. QBs these days are playing well into their late 30s and McNabb just turned 34 this season. I'd say he has at least 3 good years left. "Good years"? Dude is completing 55% of his passes. He might have 3 years left, but it's hard to envision them being good. I think Arizona is the obvious answer, they would welcome his brand of mediocrity with open arms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Next Generation Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 Arizona just makes too much sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youre Going Down Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 Arizona, he lives here already so might as well make the match once released. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brentastic Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 "Good years"? Dude is completing 55% of his passes. He might have 3 years left, but it's hard to envision them being good. I think Arizona is the obvious answer, they would welcome his brand of mediocrity with open arms. I still maintain that McNabb is a very good QB. He's on a terrible team with terrible ownership and a terrible coach. He's made Santana Moss a fantasy starter for the first time in his career. He's playing in a new offense that is exactly opposite of what he's played in his entire career. One season under completely different circumstances should not dis-credit his ability. He's been a very good QB his entire career so I'm not going to judge him on one season with a bad team. I think he'd thrive in Minnesota. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down Goes Frazia Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 the LA Vikings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tazinib1 Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 the LA Jaguars. fixed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoJoTheWebToedBoy Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 Arizona Cardinals Yep..... Perfect fit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 "Good years"? Dude is completing 55% of his passes. Yeah, 55% of his passes to B/C WRs, without the threat of a running game, so LBs can drop into coverage. I would venture a guess that if he had Gore behind him, and LBs had to stack the box and play honest, he'd be much better than 55%. You try throing the ball with Keiland Williams or Clinton Portis as your RB threat. The only games they had a healthy Torain, they competed significantly better. No rocket science there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted December 23, 2010 Author Share Posted December 23, 2010 I still maintain that McNabb is a very good QB. He's on a terrible team with terrible ownership and a terrible coach. He's made Santana Moss a fantasy starter for the first time in his career. He's playing in a new offense that is exactly opposite of what he's played in his entire career. One season under completely different circumstances should not dis-credit his ability. He's been a very good QB his entire career so I'm not going to judge him on one season with a bad team. I think he'd thrive in Minnesota. you mean the same Santana Moss that has had the following seasons? 74/1105 10TDs 84/1483 9TDs 79/1044 6 TDs That Santana Moss Or the Santana Moss that has from 2003-2009 ranked in the top 5 once top 10 twice top 20 three times top 30 5 times top 36 6 times and his worst ranking was 41st in 2007 is that the same Santana Moss that McNabb has made fantasy relevant for the 1st time in his career Just curious is all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.