CaptainHook Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Then they shouldn't have divisions at all because what would be the point of it? Just scramble the schedules every year so you don't play the same teams every year and take the top six records over all...Then there wouldn't be this ongoing issue of a non deserving team making it over a deserving team!! No. The format works fine. I just don't like a team with a losing record making the playoffs. That would be the only time my format would kick in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 I think all four road teams have better records than their hosts, yeah? no Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Packers and Eagles have same record. That is true in all other match-ups though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Couch Potatoe Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 no Well Philly and GB @ 10-6 each.... But GB did beat Philly head to head that should be given an edge in hosting a game against each other just saying for argument sake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CowboysDiehard Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 The NFC West is a joke. Has been for decades. Relegate it to the Arena league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 The NFC West is a joke. Has been for decades. Relegate it to the Arena league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Well Philly and GB @ 10-6 each.... But GB did beat Philly head to head that should be given an edge in hosting a game against each other just saying for argument sake. That wasn't the question/statement Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Couch Potatoe Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 (edited) The NFC West is a joke. Has been for decades. Relegate it to the Arena league. How many decades you speaking of because 49ers were dominating in the NFL for years and then the Rams went to 2 SBs and won 1 in the 2000's and Seattle went to the bowl in 06' And Arizona in 09' Just saying Edited January 3, 2011 by Sunday Couch Potatoe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiegie Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 (edited) The NFC West is a joke. Has been for decades. Relegate it to the Arena league. Since you are a cowboys fan, I will point out that since Dallas' last trip to the Superbowl, the NFC West has participated in more Superbowls than the NFC East has. Just saying. Edited January 3, 2011 by wiegie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Couch Potatoe Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 That wasn't the question/statement true enough tie goes to the veteran Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Couch Potatoe Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Since you are a cowboys fan, I will point out that since Dallas' last trip to the Superbowl, the NFC West has participated in more Superbowls than the NFC East has. Just saying. and this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Brilliant!!! Like I care that much about it just observing like every other skeptic of the West teams!! I've been over trying to make fun of any of the "Normal Kids" in the NFC west months ago Pffff.... Â Â San Fran had everything in place to win this division. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Couch Potatoe Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 (edited) San Fran had everything in place to win this division. Yep except for the heart discipline and desire Better times have got to be ahead... I have to keep reminding myself of this Edited January 3, 2011 by Sunday Couch Potatoe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat2334 Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Since you are a cowboys fan, I will point out that since Dallas' last trip to the Superbowl, the NFC West has participated in more Superbowls than the NFC East has. Just saying. Â Â werd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theprofessor Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Since you are a cowboys fan, I will point out that since Dallas' last trip to the Superbowl, the NFC West has participated in more Superbowls than the NFC East has. Just saying. Â And we all remember what happened the last time your Cowboys played a meaningful game at Qwest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomper Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 How many decades you speaking of because 49ers were dominating in the NFL for years and then the Rams went to 2 SBs and won 1 in the 2000's and Seattle went to the bowl in 06' And Arizona in 09' Just saying   When S.F was dominant the rest of the division couldnt beat wichita state. S.F didnt have to get their uniforms dirty until the playoffs while Dallas had to war with the Giants , Skins and Eagles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomper Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 I havent watched the Rams all year but I am pretty impressed by them. They have great young O linemen and Bradford seems like he has the goods. They could be a team to watch within the next 3-5 years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cre8tiff Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 I havent watched the Rams all year but I am pretty impressed by them. They have great young O linemen and Bradford seems like he has the goods. They could be a team to watch within the next 3-5 years  I hope so. I was wondering how long it would take teams to realize the only consistent receiver Bradford had was Amendola and take him away. Our receiving corps really, really showed thier 3rd string stripes. My wife said it was like watching "Angels in the Outfield" where some invisible force was pushing the ball out of their hands or knocking them down!  However, I think we were just plain out coached (I won't mention the extremely poor refereeing, whoops I just did.. ).  I would hope the coach loosens up a bit next year.  I have to wonder if Jackson somehow got hurt, and they didn't want to just feed it to him.  Honestly, I really wanted to win this game so Bradford and company could say they got into the playoffs. But the much higher draft pick is a very good consolation prize.  I just hope Jackson can continue to hold up so he can have a shot at a ring in the next few years. (knock on a giant block of fricken wood). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bier Meister Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 (edited) When S.F was dominant the rest of the division couldnt beat wichita state. S.F didnt have to get their uniforms dirty until the playoffs while Dallas had to war with the Giants , Skins and Eagles       6 games vs div not 8. notice that the div is stronger during their runs for the 1st 4 rings. not exactly the 'easy path" that you describe plus they had an excellent record in the playoffs against fantastic teams. absolute monster 49ers teams. if you get the chance, check out the nfc central during that time (tbb, det, gbp)...bleh.  1983: 10-6 49ers 9-7 rams 8-8 saints 7-9 falcons  75% .500 or over  1984: 15-1 49ers 10-6 rams 7-9 saints 4-12 falcons  50% .500 or over  1985: 11-5 rams 10-6 49ers 5-11 saints 4-12 falcons  50% .500 or over  1986: 10-5-1 49ers 10-6 rams 7-8-1 falcons 7-9 saints  50% .500 or over  1987: 13-2 49ers 12-3 saints 6-9 rams 3-12 falcons  50% .500 or over  1988: 10-6 49ers 10-6 rams 10-6 saints 5-11 falcons  75% .500 or over  1989: 14-2 49ers 11-5 rams 9-7 saints 3-13 saints  75% .500 or over  1990: 14-2 49ers 8-8 saints 5-11 rams 5-11 falcons  50% .500 or over  1991: 11-5 saints 10-6 falcons 10-6 49ers 3-13 rams  75% .500 or over  1992: 14-2 49ers 12-4 saints 6-10 falcons 6-10 rams  50% .500 or over  1993: 10-6 49ers 8-8 saints 6-10 falcons 5-11 rams  50% .500 or over  1994: 13-3 49ers 7-9 saints 7-9 falcons 4-12 rams  25% .500 or over  1995: 11-5 49ers 9-7 falcons 7-9 panthers 7-9 saints 7-9 rams  40% .500 or over..... 3 at 7-9  1996: 12-4 49ers 12-4 panthers 6-10 rams 3-13 falcons 3-13 saints  40% .500 or over  1997: 13-3 49ers 7-9 falcons 7-9 panthers 6-10 saints 5-11 rams  20% .500 or over  1998: 14-2 falcons 12-4 49ers 6-10 saints 4-12 rams 4-12 panthers  40% .500 or over  1999: 13-3 rams 8-8 panthers 5-11 falcons 4-12 49ers 3-13 saints  40% .500 or over  2000: 10-6 saints 10-6 rams 7-9 panthers 6-10 49ers 4-12 falcons  40% .500 or over  2001: 14-2 rams 12-4 49ers 7-9 falcons 7-9 saints 1-15 panthers  40% .500 or over Edited January 4, 2011 by Bier Meister Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 The NFC West is a joke. Has been for decades. Relegate it to the Arena league. Â Â Well, the Arena League went teats up. Â It makes the joke funnier if you knew that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 Well, the Arena League went teats up. Â It makes the joke funnier if you knew that. It did, but it had been revived. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Couch Potatoe Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 When S.F was dominant the rest of the division couldnt beat wichita state. S.F didnt have to get their uniforms dirty until the playoffs while Dallas had to war with the Giants , Skins and Eagles See Bier Meister's post   Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomper Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 (edited) 6 times in a 7 year span that Dallas was succesful in, including superbowl wins, they had 3 teams in the division that were .500 or better. in the 17 years you posted above it happened 3 times    NFC East Team  1990 3 teams over .500  New York Giants 13 -3 Philadelphia Eagles 10-6 . Washington Redskins 10-6 Dallas Cowboys 7-9 Phoenix Cardinals 5-11  1991 4 teams over or at .500  NFC East Team W L T Washington Redskins 14 2 Dallas Cowboys 11 5 0 Philadelphia Eagles 10 6 0 New York Giants 8 8 0 Phoenix Cardinals 4 12 0  1992 3 teams over .500  Dallas Cowboys 13 3 0 Philadelphia Eagles 11 5 0 Washington Redskins 9 7 New York Giants 6 10 0 Phoenix Cardinals 4 12 0  1993 3 teams over .500   Dallas Cowboys 12 4 0 New York Giants 11 5 0 Philadelphia Eagles 8 8 0 Phoenix Cardinals 7 9 0 Washington Redskins 4 12  1994 3 teams over or at .500   Dallas Cowboys 12 4 0 New York Giants 9 7 0 Arizona Cardinals 8 8 0 Philadelphia Eagles 7 9 0 Washington Redskins 3 13  1995 2 teams over .500   Dallas Cowboys 12 4 Philadelphia Eagles 10 6 Washington Redskins 6 10 New York Giants 5 11 Arizona Cardinals 4 12  1996 3 teams over .500  Dallas Cowboys 10 6 0 Philadelphia Eagles 10 6 0 Washington Redskins 9 7 Arizona Cardinals 7 9 0 New York Giants 6 10 0 Edited January 4, 2011 by whomper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomper Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 Since you are a cowboys fan, I will point out that since Dallas' last trip to the Superbowl, the NFC West has participated in more Superbowls than the NFC East has. Just saying. Â Â Thats because the Eagles were the dominant team in the NFC East during that Era. They have always been the embarrasing step child of our division that couldnt bring home the hardware Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bier Meister Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 9ers were dominant in the 80's... and very good in the 90's. the nfc west was stronger during their strongest years. take a look at the central and east in the 80's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.