MrTed46 Posted May 11, 2011 Author Share Posted May 11, 2011 Your posting of this thread has ruined it for everyone else. If you look at my history of predictions, I probably helped 11 guys in alot of 12 people leagues... But anyway... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearBroncos Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 Good point about Baldwin. I don't like where he landed. I would take Cobb over him too actually. Actually, I think Baldwin landed in the best possible spot. Bowe will help with double coverage and Baldwin was the missing ingredient in that franchise. I think Baldwin has the best potential at WR2/WR1 (low end) numbers in year 1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
half_hennessy Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 I actually thought the same about Baldwin he isnot going to have to be relied upon as a focal point of the offense which could help him put up good numbers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbass24 Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 Baldwin landing in KC really was the best spot for him. Teams can't double him in his younger years deflating him mentally and with Charles in the back field and Bowe on the other side he will have chances to learn on the fly. His upside is great and being able to grab him middle to late 1st round the risk/reward is not bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billay Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 As a UNC fan who saw Little play a significant number of games, I am intrigued by all the hype. Little always struck me as a "jack of all trades, master of none" kind of player, who got by on athleticism alone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Billy Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 I think Baldwin has the best potential at WR2/WR1 (low end) numbers in year 1. A rookie WR who is the WR2 on his team in a run-first O is going to finish in the top 15 for FF WRs? Really? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tazinib1 Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 Actually, I think Baldwin landed in the best possible spot. Bowe will help with double coverage and Baldwin was the missing ingredient in that franchise. I think Baldwin has the best potential at WR2/WR1 (low end) numbers in year 1. Thats crazy talk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caddyman Posted May 17, 2011 Share Posted May 17, 2011 A rookie WR who is the WR2 on his team in a run-first O is going to finish in the top 15 for FF WRs? Really? Amen....watched him play every game at Pitt. Took too many plays off and plenty of his catches were because he was just physically better than the guy covering him. That factor will be pretty much gone in the NFL. He will be lucky to finish in the top 50 WR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
texanhooters Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 I took a chance on him on in the 14th round. After watching some highlights I am going to stash Little on my bench. I took Hillis with my second to last pick last year in the draft. Little reminds me of him a bit how he can drag a pile of 3-5 guys with him after a catch. Very big target, fast, good hands. The attitude does not concern me all that much. He's coming into a league of many very talented players with attitude. as long as he keeps himself out of trouble and can stay on the field. I called this guy my wr sleeper of the year at the draft and everyone laughed at me. It's ok ... they all laughed last year when I took Hillis I guess they have short memories. Guess we will see how it unfolds before long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.