Bronco Billy Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 (edited) @MikeSilver Michael Silver I've learned that Bengals RB Cedric Benson was notified of a three-game suspension for player-conduct violations (during the lockout)... link Edited September 22, 2011 by Bronco Billy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Billy Posted September 22, 2011 Author Share Posted September 22, 2011 More: ...Benson's appeal of the three-game suspension will be heard next Tuesday 37 minutes ago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Billy Posted September 22, 2011 Author Share Posted September 22, 2011 MikeSilver Michael Silver If the appeal does not result in a reduction or elimination of the suspension, Benson would miss Cinci's games vs. Buffalo, Jax and Indy 36 minutes ago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
montster Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 He's supposed to be OK for this week and suspended beginning week 4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tazinib1 Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 Ugh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wolf Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 Time to pick up Bernard Scott..! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Billy Posted September 22, 2011 Author Share Posted September 22, 2011 Time to pick up Bernard Scott..! Talk about a guy in search of an opportunity... Scott also seems to fit in Gruden's O and is a better fit for Dalton's skill set, but Lewis just is determined that he isn't capable of sustaining 20 touches a game. The kid has looked a lot better and more dangerous with the ball than Benson, especially this year. Maybe this will give him his chance Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delfamdelfam Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 no way they can suspend him because it was during the lockout. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrimsonGhost Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 If this goes through Ginsu the NFL. Kenny britts ass better get suspended then too...Im so sick of Roger Goodell. The dude is a turd. And why does this news come up now? should have been discussed WEEKS ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Billy Posted September 22, 2011 Author Share Posted September 22, 2011 no way they can suspend him because it was during the lockout. Not sure that's true for a conviction. Also - the appeal process goes right through Goodell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Billy Posted September 22, 2011 Author Share Posted September 22, 2011 Kenny britts ass better get suspended then too... Could still happen. Isn't his case still pending? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wolf Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 I disagree with the NFL's stance here. The players were locked out. They were not under contract and as such, should not be subjected to the conduct policy. To take it a step further, players and coaches who had issues while they played / coached in college should not be suspended upon entering the NFL. It's just wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delusions of grandeur Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 no way they can suspend him because it was during the lockout. You keep saying this, but there's nothing to back up that assertion, other than a bit of speculation during the lockout about whether Goodell would levy fines and suspensions for actions during the lockout... Obviously the Benson situation shows that it's not the case, and it's entirely up to Goodell how he decides to handle the situations. Though I still don't get how Benson is being treated like the repeat offender that he is, while Britt got nothing but a slap on the wrist after his 6th arrest in 2 years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chargerz Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 I disagree with the NFL's stance here. The players were locked out. They were not under contract and as such, should not be subjected to the conduct policy. To take it a step further, players and coaches who had issues while they played / coached in college should not be suspended upon entering the NFL. It's just wrong. This. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delusions of grandeur Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 (edited) I disagree with the NFL's stance here. The players were locked out. They were not under contract and as such, should not be subjected to the conduct policy. To take it a step further, players and coaches who had issues while they played / coached in college should not be suspended upon entering the NFL. It's just wrong. I made an argument in a previous thread that once you become a part of the NFL, you become a part of their public image. Thus you are subject to their conduct policy up until you retire, no matter whether it's the offseason, or in this case the lockout.... You may say that's unfair, but I know my employer wouldn't take too kindly for me getting arrested while I was on a sabatical/hiatus and still represented the company. But not to get caught up in that loose example, these guys are paid in part to be public figures and represent the league, so if you're going to use their image to prosper yourself, then you can't be doing things that are going to tarnish that image.... It'd be different if the guys were no longer employed by the NFL, but their contracts they signed prior to the lockout are still in effect. It isn't like they're reapplying to the league and a statute of limitations prohibits punishment for past actions. They were still employees before, during and after the lockout. Edit: Though I guess the Pryor situation throws my argument out the window as that is no doubt where the NFL is crossing the line. Edited September 22, 2011 by delusions of granduer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wolf Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 (edited) I made an argument in a previous thread that once you become a part of the NFL, you become a part of their public image. Thus you are subject to their conduct policy up until you retire, no matter whether it's the offseason, or in this case the lockout.... You may say that's unfair, but I know my employer wouldn't take too kindly for me getting arrested while I was on a sabatical/hiatus and still represented the company. But not to get caught up in that loose example, these guys are paid in part to be public figures and represent the league, so if you're going to use their image to prosper yourself, then you can't be doing things that are going to tarnish that image.... It'd be different if the guys were no longer employed by the NFL, but their contracts they signed prior to the lockout are still in effect. It isn't like they're reapplying to the league and a statute of limitations prohibits punishment for past actions. They were still employees before, during and after the lockout. Edit: Though I guess the Pryor situation throws my argument out the window as that is no doubt where the NFL is crossing the line. My employer would agree with yours. Here's the difference and the reason I disagree. The players were locked out. That was not of their choosing, as you or I taking a sabbatical or going on hiatus is ours. That's not to say I think players who act up are wise. They knew what we did: eventually the NFL was going to be back in business and people have long memories. THATS the difference...it's choice. You lock me out and still expect me to act in the image YOU want? F-off NFL. I'm not an NFL player at the moment. Edited September 22, 2011 by The Wolf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goopster24 Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 Drafted Bernard Scott late and stuck him on my practice squad. Would be bummed to call him up and lose the benefit of keeping him there. Love his ability though, looked great in preseason. Goodell has been great for the game but sh!t like this makes me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pope Flick Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 (edited) My employer would agree with yours. Here's the difference and the reason I disagree. The players were locked out. That was not of their choosing, as you or I taking a sabbatical or going on hiatus is ours. That's not to say I think players who act up are wise. They knew what we did: eventually the NFL was going to be back in business and people have long memories. THATS the difference...it's choice. You lock me out and still expect me to act in the image YOU want? F-off NFL. I'm not an NFL player at the moment. Except that you are still under contract so those image rules apply. And I'd say the Puor situation is different because it's a matter of image again and avoiding the situation where a college player could get kicked out of school for drug dealing but then get drafted by the NFL for millions. That's a move to prevent gaming of the system. Edited September 22, 2011 by Pope Flick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delusions of grandeur Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 THATS the difference...it's choice. You lock me out and still expect me to act in the image YOU want? F-off NFL. I'm not an NFL player at the moment. Then they have the choice to leave the NFL if they don't like it's rules, but persons who were under contract prior to the lockout are subject to the rules they agreed to when they entered the league, which includes their conduct policy. Here's part of it: General policy Engaging in violent and/or criminal activity is unacceptable and constitutes conduct detrimental to the integrity of and public confidence in the National Football League. Such conduct alienates the fans on whom the success of the League depends and has negative and sometimes tragic consequences for both the victim and the perpetrator. The League is committed to promoting and encouraging lawful conduct and to providing a safe and professional workplace for its employees. Persons covered by policy The following persons ("Covered Persons") shall be considered subject to this Policy: (i) all players under contract; (ii) all full-time employees of the National Football League, its Member Clubs and related entities; (iii) all rookie players once they are selected in the NFL college draft; and (iv) all undrafted rookie players, unsigned veterans and other prospective employees once they commence negotiations with a Club concerning employment. I mean, the NFL didn't fire them and null all contracts. The lockout was about coming up with a new future agreement, not a loophole to do whatever you want in spite of the contract you agreed to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RussMan Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 Pryor and Tressel were suspended and they werent even in the league... they certainly can and will lower the boom on repeat offender Benson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goopster24 Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 So what's the etiquette on trading Benson? Do I need to tell potential suitor that a suspension might be coming....? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goldenboy81 Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 More confirmation from ESPN (got their info from Yahoo): Cincinnati running back Cedric Benson has been served a three-game suspension from the NFL, according to a report by Yahoo Sports. This only adds to the Bengals' troubles this week, which included starting wide receiver Jerome Simpson getting detained in a Josh Gordon incident. This isn't the type of publicity the Bengals wanted heading into a home opener that is already blacked out. Benson will be allowed to play Sunday against San Francisco because his appeal will reportedly be heard Tuesday. If the suspension is upheld, he would miss Cincinnati's next three games against Buffalo, Jacksonville and Indianapolis. He was sentenced last month after striking deals for two misdemeanor assault cases stemming from separate incidents in Austin, Texas (the last one occurred two months ago during the lockout). He eventually served five days in jail just before the start of the season. Losing Benson for that stretch will hurt Cincinnati, especially in the games against the Bills (21st-ranked run defense) and Colts (29th). Bernard Scott would likely fill in as the starting running back ESPN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goopster24 Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 You guys really don't think Scott can have success? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goldenboy81 Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 (edited) Yahoo's Post (looks like all of this information is coming from one source, Michael Silver): Cincinnati Bengals running back Cedric Benson(notes) has been suspended for three games, according to a tweet from Michael Silver of Yahoo! Sports. Benson has plans to appeal the suspension, which apparently stems from the personal conduct policy during the lockout. Benson spent time in jail in Texas on an assault charge between the end of preseason and the start of the regular season. According to the report, he will play this weekend against the San Francisco 49ers as the case makes its way through the appeals process Yahoo Edited September 22, 2011 by goldenboy81 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goopster24 Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 Love Silver, legit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.