Ditkaless Wonders Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 You're right about opportunities but you should never discount the unnecessary denial of opportunities. The Lions will take the division this year so start praying for a wild card Packer fans. Should that happen we have the comfort from recent history of knowing that they can do more with that wild card birth than the Bears can with the Division crown and a dream playoff scenario handed to them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratesownninjas Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Still worked and burned the packers. Then the refs burned the Bears. Lovie will probably try it every couple of weeks. Yep. There should be no rules when the ball is in the air during a punt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ditkaless Wonders Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 c'mon Hugh, if you watched the game you would know they didn't get keeeeled at all. They did lose though btw. Twice as many first downs, a hundred more yards of offense, and 15 minutes more possession time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNOWBOUND33 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Should that happen we have the comfort from recent history of knowing that they can do more with that wild card birth than the Bears can with the Division crown and a dream playoff scenario handed to them. Bears overachieved last year. The Packers have more talent and probably a better coach. Was just stating the facts as you are. Stats can be very misleading. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ditkaless Wonders Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Bears overachieved last year. The Packers have more talent and probably a better coach. Was just stating the facts as you are. Stats can be very misleading. Like a padded underwire bra. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pope Flick Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Clearly the O is dragging this team down. The Bears still have the best D/special teams in the division. And 1-2 sucks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 (edited) Vikings fan right now really shouldn't be commenting on any other teams shortcomings. Edited September 26, 2011 by Hugh 0ne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNOWBOUND33 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Vikings fan right now really shouldn't be commenting on any other teams shortcomings. Vikings were always my #2 team just to beat Faavray. Plus I liked alot of players over the years on some of those teams. Your team has played 90 minutes very well this year right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Vikings were always my #2 team just to beat Faavray. Plus I liked alot of players over the years on some of those teams. Your team has played 90 minutes very well this year right? I asked a fanatical Vikes fan this morning what the next number in the sequence 10, 17, 20 would be? She thought about it a while and said she didn't know. I told her nor did anyone else but she'd find out next Sunday. It would be the amount the Vikes led KC by at half time before losing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 I asked a fanatical Vikes fan this morning what the next number in the sequence 10, 17, 20 would be? By the pattern, 19 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 By the pattern, 19 Wouldn't it be 27? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Wouldn't it be 27? 10 to 17 = +7 17 to 20 = +3, which is a -4 difference Apply the -4 to the +3 to get a -1, add to 20 to get 19. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNOWBOUND33 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 10 to 17 = +717 to 20 = +3, which is a -4 difference Apply the -4 to the +3 to get a -1, add to 20 to get 19. The problem is the Chiefs maxed their output for the year this week with 17. How can the Vikes lose?????? oh wait, 7,3,17 7-3 =-4 3-17=+14 17 + 14 = 31. Can the Vikes score more than 31 in a half? Did I do that right Big John. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 The problem is the Chiefs maxed their output for the year this week with 17. How can the Vikes lose?????? oh wait, 7,3,17 7-3 =-4 3-17=+14 17 + 14 = 31. Can the Vikes score more than 31 in a half? Did I do that right Big John. Not quite. 14- (-4) = +18 differential between weeks then 17+18 = 35. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNOWBOUND33 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Not quite. 14- (-4) = +18 differential between weeksthen 17+18 = 35. I just caught that as I re-read. You're my hero John. Even if you like the Packers. Right? I am now going to apply this theory to all my wagers and ff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.