dstungah Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 (edited) Dwayne Bowe, KC WR for Peyton Hillis, Cle RB Darrius Heyward-Bey, Oak WR The rest of the rosters aside, dont you think Bowe is worth a hell of a lot more than (an injured) Hillis and Heyward-Bey? Just my thoughts, don't get sensitive over the term trade rape. Its from The League and it's funny. Edited October 28, 2011 by dstungah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decimator Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Seems fair to me, considering how spotty Bowe can be. If Hillis comes back, he'll contribute, and DHB has 3 80-yard games in a row. Shrug your shoulders and move on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
historymike Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Looks like a crapshoot: will Bowe ever be consistently a stud again? Will Hillis be a regular starter again for the Brownies this year? Will the QB situation settle enough to make DH-B a factor? Either side (or both owners) might win here, and this is one of those trades where there are plenty of wild cards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scooby's Hubby Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 do not see how this is rape in any sense ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BA Baracus Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 It all depends on how you personally value each of these erratic players. This trade should not be interfered with, that's for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrab Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 I'm starting to think no trades are fair based on the many questions that show up here every week asking for help in defending or denying a trade. The primary reason people think these trades aren't fair is because they do not benefit them. Why not just make it a rule there is no trading. Our league requires trades be approved by the commissioner (we have 2 co-commish) and in nearly 20 years we have never had a single trade we didn't approve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piranha-z Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 (edited) I'm starting to think no trades are fair based on the many questions that show up here every week asking for help in defending or denying a trade. The primary reason people think these trades aren't fair is because they do not benefit them. Why not just make it a rule there is no trading. Our league requires trades be approved by the commissioner (we have 2 co-commish) and in nearly 20 years we have never had a single trade we didn't approve. I was able to say the same thing until yesterday Half the fun for me is researching and trying to find good trades. No two trades are ever alike because the teams are always different and depends on current rosters. I enjoy the trading part of FF. But when you deal with someone that takes it way too serious and feels they can control who should trade who, that crosses the line IMO. Edited October 28, 2011 by Piranha-z Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SecondString Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 I'm starting to think no trades are fair based on the many questions that show up here every week asking for help in defending or denying a trade. The primary reason people think these trades aren't fair is because they do not benefit them. Why not just make it a rule there is no trading. Our league requires trades be approved by the commissioner (we have 2 co-commish) and in nearly 20 years we have never had a single trade we didn't approve. I think the reason there are so many questions about trades on the boards is because almost no matter what the trade is, there is always somebody crying foul, most of the time with no justification. That puts anyone involved in a trade automatically on the defensive, and having to justify the trade to others so it won't be vetoed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubbahawk Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Never ever never ever never ever Veto a trade! never ever? NEVER EVER! oh and stop calling it Rape. There is nothing funny about the term or it's misuse in fantasy football. I hope one day you will have a daughter and then maybe you will get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dstungah Posted October 29, 2011 Author Share Posted October 29, 2011 I KNEW somebody was gonna get sensitive about the term! There was never any discussion about vetoing this trade, i would never have done that. Thanks for the comments dudes! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubbahawk Posted October 29, 2011 Share Posted October 29, 2011 I KNEW somebody was gonna get sensitive about the term! There was never any discussion about vetoing this trade, i would never have done that. Thanks for the comments dudes! If you Knew somebody was going to be sensitive about the term then you also knew that there was something wrong with it. If there was no discussion about vetoing the trade....what is the point of this thread? What exactly are you trying to accomplish? Is it a fair trade? who cares most trades aren't fair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donutrun Jellies Posted October 29, 2011 Share Posted October 29, 2011 It all depends on how you personally value each of these erratic players. This trade should not be interfered with, that's for sure. Perfectly stated. I pity the fool who disagrees with BA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donutrun Jellies Posted October 29, 2011 Share Posted October 29, 2011 Never ever never ever never ever Veto a trade! never ever? NEVER EVER! oh and stop calling it Rape. There is nothing funny about the term or it's misuse in fantasy football. I hope one day you will have a daughter and then maybe you will get it. Wisdom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fitzkek Posted October 30, 2011 Share Posted October 30, 2011 If you Knew somebody was going to be sensitive about the term then you also knew that there was something wrong with it. If there was no discussion about vetoing the trade....what is the point of this thread? What exactly are you trying to accomplish? Is it a fair trade? who cares most trades aren't fair. Is this guy for real? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skhyatt Posted October 30, 2011 Share Posted October 30, 2011 Looks like a crapshoot: will Bowe ever be consistently a stud again? Will Hillis be a regular starter again for the Brownies this year? Will the QB situation settle enough to make DH-B a factor? Either side (or both owners) might win here, and this is one of those trades where there are plenty of wild cards. Agreed... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.