new top chef
#26
Posted 17 November 2011 - 05:34 PM
#27
Posted 17 November 2011 - 06:08 PM
untateve, on 11/17/11 11:34pm, said:
Same conversation as my house. I dont like either of the girls who were trying to sell him out. Snotty beetches.
#28
Posted 18 November 2011 - 08:13 AM
untateve, on 11/17/11 5:34pm, said:
#30
Posted 18 November 2011 - 09:48 AM
Peace
policy
#31
Posted 20 November 2011 - 11:34 AM
twiley, on 11/13/11 9:11am, said:
a little bit of both. the editing on those shows will make people look worse than they are, no doubt. but he is cocky & confident too, but for good reason. before all the Top Chef stuff came about, when we shared a house, he would cook stuff I wouldn't have ever even thought about. One day he cooked a mussel souffle out of the blue, just cause we had some mussels....and it was incredible. he was working on the molecular gastronomy stuff long before you even saw it on the food network, back when ferran adria & wylie dufrene were the only ones really doing it.
but he was, and still is, a very good person & a good friend. he was the very first person I met when I moved up to Hyde Park for school, and he welcomed me into his house. he's absolutely nowhere near as annoying as he was on the show. if I hadn't known him before TC, he probably would have been one of my least favorites haha. but it's a competition, and he understood that.
#32
Posted 20 November 2011 - 11:38 AM
#33
Posted 27 November 2011 - 11:36 AM
#34
Posted 27 November 2011 - 03:10 PM
twiley, on 11/27/11 10:36am, said:
haha, yeah his coworker was definitely all over him. I was hoping the asian girl would get the boot, but she nailed that final dish.
#35
Posted 16 December 2011 - 03:31 PM
#36
Posted 06 January 2012 - 03:44 PM
mrip, on 12/16/11 2:31pm, said:
I haven't noticed really...
that "BBQ" cookoff was a joke.
First of all, Salt Lick wouldn't be in my top 5 BBQ places in or near Austin, and I could poll 20 friends & I would be surprised if any of them would say that it is theirs.
Second, the pit that they showed at the Salt Lick isn't where they smoke the meat...it's a finishing grill that they pull meat from before slicing & serving it.
Third, smoked meat isn't slathered in sauce as it smokes. It wouldn't take on the smoke with a wet surface.
Fourth...in order to smoke meat, they have to be able to contain the smoke. why would they give them those open pits (finishing pits) to smoke the meat? Or were they trying to see if they used the box smoker instead? But I only saw one box smoker....
I'd have put the briskets in the smoker first & foremost (and damn sure wouldn't have wrapped em in foil), let em smoke for 12-15 hours, then pulled those off & put the ribs & chicken on the smoker for the last 3-4 hours. period, done. in the meantime I would have done up my sides....but probably would have done something a little more original than beans & cole slaw, or at least changed em up a bit.
I still say Paul will win...but revoke my prediction of Chicago Chris being in the final 3.
#37
Posted 06 January 2012 - 04:22 PM
seekrain, on 1/6/12 2:44pm, said:
that "BBQ" cookoff was a joke.
First of all, Salt Lick wouldn't be in my top 5 BBQ places in or near Austin, and I could poll 20 friends & I would be surprised if any of them would say that it is theirs.
Second, the pit that they showed at the Salt Lick isn't where they smoke the meat...it's a finishing grill that they pull meat from before slicing & serving it.
Third, smoked meat isn't slathered in sauce as it smokes. It wouldn't take on the smoke with a wet surface.
Fourth...in order to smoke meat, they have to be able to contain the smoke. why would they give them those open pits (finishing pits) to smoke the meat? Or were they trying to see if they used the box smoker instead? But I only saw one box smoker....
I'd have put the briskets in the smoker first & foremost (and damn sure wouldn't have wrapped em in foil), let em smoke for 12-15 hours, then pulled those off & put the ribs & chicken on the smoker for the last 3-4 hours. period, done. in the meantime I would have done up my sides....but probably would have done something a little more original than beans & cole slaw, or at least changed em up a bit.
I still say Paul will win...but revoke my prediction of Chicago Chris being in the final 3.
My beans would have been in the bottom of that smoker soaking up the drippings.
#38
Posted 08 January 2012 - 11:08 PM
seekrain, on 1/6/12 2:44pm, said:
that "BBQ" cookoff was a joke.
First of all, Salt Lick wouldn't be in my top 5 BBQ places in or near Austin, and I could poll 20 friends & I would be surprised if any of them would say that it is theirs.
Second, the pit that they showed at the Salt Lick isn't where they smoke the meat...it's a finishing grill that they pull meat from before slicing & serving it.
Third, smoked meat isn't slathered in sauce as it smokes. It wouldn't take on the smoke with a wet surface.
Fourth...in order to smoke meat, they have to be able to contain the smoke. why would they give them those open pits (finishing pits) to smoke the meat? Or were they trying to see if they used the box smoker instead? But I only saw one box smoker....
I'd have put the briskets in the smoker first & foremost (and damn sure wouldn't have wrapped em in foil), let em smoke for 12-15 hours, then pulled those off & put the ribs & chicken on the smoker for the last 3-4 hours. period, done. in the meantime I would have done up my sides....but probably would have done something a little more original than beans & cole slaw, or at least changed em up a bit.
I still say Paul will win...but revoke my prediction of Chicago Chris being in the final 3.
#39
Posted 19 January 2012 - 05:59 PM
#43
Posted 01 February 2012 - 10:46 PM
#45
Posted 15 February 2012 - 10:54 PM
#46
Posted 23 February 2012 - 01:38 PM
Well at least we can count on a straight up finale, no gimmicks or BS games.
Edited by seekrain, 23 February 2012 - 01:38 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












