BeachBum Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 So, I'm in this neat league where I now play a team from "The Other Group" for a title (and some "points") He and I both have Chris Johnson and Blount as our starting RBs. . I think I have better QB, TE, and the WRs are pretty even. There are also PKs and Defs. So would you start the same 2 RBs (obviously we end up even there) and hope the rest of your lineup prevails, OR would you change a RB just to have a better chance to score more points there? (Besides the idea of starting the players who will score the most points!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMD Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 Probably not unless it was really crystal clear you were superior. I would always arrange my starters based on what I think gets the most points and not try to game the matchups. Just seems like too big of a risk to do that to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL Fan Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 Yep, seems to me you're asking for trouble, and that you'll almost certainly end up picking RB's who score less. If you thought one of those bench guys would score more, you'd have have started him in the first place, before you knew your opponent's lineup, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.