kdog55 Posted December 27, 2011 Share Posted December 27, 2011 (edited) ....Although you both carried me all year, you truly sank my championship game. Lost by a total of 15 pts. If just 1 of you hit your avg. (or even played!) I would be champion! I know there were 'warning signs" on Romo, but my #2 QB is Dalton and it would have taken SOOOOOME balls to sit Romo for him! ASYS! Plus it was Christmas eve and I was not glued to my computer like i usually am on normal Sundays. Anyway, live and learn...... PS... Thanks fellow forum Huddlers for helping me to a #2 finish and at least cashing in some this year! First year without ANY paysites due to the economy and first year to make a championship game! Hmmmmm...... Good luck to you guys with week 17 championships! Edited December 27, 2011 by kdog55 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrab Posted December 27, 2011 Share Posted December 27, 2011 ....Although you both carried me all year, you truly sank my championship game. Lost by a total of 15 pts. If just 1 of you hit your avg. (or even played!) I would be champion!I know there were 'warning signs" on Romo, but my #2 QB is Dalton and it would have taken SOOOOOME balls to sit Romo for him! ASYS! Plus it was Christmas eve and I was not glued to my computer like i usually am on normal Sundays. Anyway, live and learn...... PS... Thanks fellow forum Huddlers for helping me to a #2 finish and at least cashing in some this year! First year without ANY paysites due to the economy and first year to make a championship game! Hmmmmm...... Good luck to you guys with week 17 championships! What warning signs, he was injured Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.K.Trey Posted December 27, 2011 Share Posted December 27, 2011 What warning signs, he was injured I think he was speaking about the game being meaningless for Dallas, as the NYG had already won. I am sure alot of people sat Romo after the NYG win as I do not think he woulda played the whole game if he wasn't injured, but we will never know I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrab Posted December 27, 2011 Share Posted December 27, 2011 I think he was speaking about the game being meaningless for Dallas, as the NYG had already won. I am sure alot of people sat Romo after the NYG win as I do not think he woulda played the whole game if he wasn't injured, but we will never know I guess. Ok, I suppose I can see that. But you'd have to have another QB to play instead, and you'd have to wait until the NYG-NYJ was over (or at least in hand) to make your decision. Considering one game started when the other one was going to finish its a pretty hard decision to make. So you either play Romo and hope for the best, or you have a better option and sit him BEFORE knowing the result of Giants game and potential impact on Romo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.K.Trey Posted December 27, 2011 Share Posted December 27, 2011 Ok, I suppose I can see that. But you'd have to have another QB to play instead, and you'd have to wait until the NYG-NYJ was over (or at least in hand) to make your decision. Considering one game started when the other one was going to finish its a pretty hard decision to make. So you either play Romo and hope for the best, or you have a better option and sit him BEFORE knowing the result of Giants game and potential impact on Romo. I agree with you , This decision had to be made before 4pm and only if you had a decent option also playing at 4pm. Just trying to clarify what I think he might have been saying . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted December 27, 2011 Share Posted December 27, 2011 I know there were 'warning signs" on Romo, but my #2 QB is Dalton and it would have taken SOOOOOME balls to sit Romo for him! After Swammi's most excellent post concerning Dallas players (which you may not have seen) I would have had no trouble at all starting Dalton. FWIW, I think next year he is a likely starter in a 12 man FF league for those that like to wait on their QB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdog55 Posted December 27, 2011 Author Share Posted December 27, 2011 Yep, I meant the possible "meaningless game" theory. Not sure I would of had the balls to start Dalton over Romo anyway. I gotta admit though that I did not see any of the articles as the Christmas Eve traveling was well underway before noon and I didnt even get to see Romo was out until the second quarter when I finally arrived at my mothers and got to check out the games there. Was not a very happy evening! Then Shady going down was just the icing on the cake! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
detlef Posted December 27, 2011 Share Posted December 27, 2011 After Swammi's most excellent post concerning Dallas players (which you may not have seen) I would have had no trouble at all starting Dalton. FWIW, I think next year he is a likely starter in a 12 man FF league for those that like to wait on their QB. Exactly, threads like that are why we come here. In fact, I was kicking myself for not finding another kicker than Bailey (though you'd like to think that Dallas could manage better than a lone TD with 7 seconds on the clock even without their starters). Fortunately, neither Bailey's 1 pt or Boss' 1 pt came back to haunt me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.