Jonathon Stewart to Denver?
#1
Posted 19 March 2012 - 11:09 AM
What say you?
#2
Posted 19 March 2012 - 11:13 AM
#3
Posted 19 March 2012 - 11:21 AM
#5
Posted 19 March 2012 - 11:30 AM
KO'd
#7
Posted 19 March 2012 - 11:32 AM
#8
Posted 19 March 2012 - 11:35 AM
#10
Posted 19 March 2012 - 11:45 AM
#13
Posted 19 March 2012 - 11:52 AM
#14
Posted 19 March 2012 - 12:19 PM
Jonathan Stewart - RB - Panthers
"Multiple team sources" tell the Charlotte Observer that Jonathan Stewart is "unlikely" to be traded despite the Panthers' addition of Mike Tolbert.
The Panthers will face a tough decision when Stewart enters 2013 free agency, but for now they're poised to keep him along with DeAngelo Williams and Tolbert. Tolbert will likely shoulder some of the load on passing downs, and cover kicks on special teams. Stewart and Williams will be the primary backs. The Panthers could consider cutting Williams and re-signing Stewart next offseason, although releasing DeAngelo would cause a roughly $5 million cap hit in 2013.
#15
Posted 19 March 2012 - 12:25 PM
BearBroncos, on 19 March 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:
Jonathan Stewart - RB - Panthers
"Multiple team sources" tell the Charlotte Observer that Jonathan Stewart is "unlikely" to be traded despite the Panthers' addition of Mike Tolbert.
The Panthers will face a tough decision when Stewart enters 2013 free agency, but for now they're poised to keep him along with DeAngelo Williams and Tolbert. Tolbert will likely shoulder some of the load on passing downs, and cover kicks on special teams. Stewart and Williams will be the primary backs. The Panthers could consider cutting Williams and re-signing Stewart next offseason, although releasing DeAngelo would cause a roughly $5 million cap hit in 2013.
#16
Posted 19 March 2012 - 12:25 PM
BearBroncos, on 19 March 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:
Jonathan Stewart - RB - Panthers
"Multiple team sources" tell the Charlotte Observer that Jonathan Stewart is "unlikely" to be traded despite the Panthers' addition of Mike Tolbert.
The Panthers will face a tough decision when Stewart enters 2013 free agency, but for now they're poised to keep him along with DeAngelo Williams and Tolbert. Tolbert will likely shoulder some of the load on passing downs, and cover kicks on special teams. Stewart and Williams will be the primary backs. The Panthers could consider cutting Williams and re-signing Stewart next offseason, although releasing DeAngelo would cause a roughly $5 million cap hit in 2013.
#17
Posted 19 March 2012 - 12:28 PM
#18
Posted 19 March 2012 - 12:33 PM
BearBroncos, on 19 March 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:
Jonathan Stewart - RB - Panthers
"Multiple team sources" tell the Charlotte Observer that Jonathan Stewart is "unlikely" to be traded despite the Panthers' addition of Mike Tolbert.
The Panthers will face a tough decision when Stewart enters 2013 free agency, but for now they're poised to keep him along with DeAngelo Williams and Tolbert. Tolbert will likely shoulder some of the load on passing downs, and cover kicks on special teams. Stewart and Williams will be the primary backs. The Panthers could consider cutting Williams and re-signing Stewart next offseason, although releasing DeAngelo would cause a roughly $5 million cap hit in 2013.
Stupid. Just plain dumb IMO. Those are valuable assets they can use to shore up other areas of the team. Why the he11 keep all three, not to mention that they have a RB playing QB also?
Makes no sense to me.
#19
Posted 19 March 2012 - 12:34 PM
flemingd, on 19 March 2012 - 11:52 AM, said:
I guess if they think Tolbert can handle a good portion of the work, then they could easily let Stewart go to fill other holes, and have Tolbert, Williams, Goodson (and of course Cam vultures all the TDs anyway) in sort of a RBBC.
#20
Posted 19 March 2012 - 12:46 PM
#21
Posted 19 March 2012 - 01:10 PM
#23
Posted 19 March 2012 - 03:46 PM
There's no reason they sign Tolbert unless they are planning to be without either J Stew or D Will in the near future
Edited by efi4eye, 19 March 2012 - 03:46 PM.
#24
Posted 19 March 2012 - 06:37 PM
bpwallace49, on 19 March 2012 - 11:35 AM, said:
If the Packers gave up a second rounder for more offense with their defensive needs I would have to return to the area to shoot the GM's dog. (Any GM whose first and lst name initials are the same should be aware that there is precedence for this type of senseless, cruel, ignorant violence)
#25
Posted 19 March 2012 - 06:52 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












