In going over things to rewrite the rules noticed that the max IP is set at 1600. this was the set up for a 12 team since we have 9 we are going to hit that mark quite earlyso far this season i feel that it needs to be changed to something higher like 1800-1900. That is an extra full time SP. or we could go unlimited or whatever. just voice an opinion and/or give a #.
Thanks
Mel
ps get the fees in.
please vote
Started by SLAYER, Apr 14 2012 05:21 AM
7 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 14 April 2012 - 05:21 AM
#2
Posted 14 April 2012 - 07:43 AM
I vote no. I don't think any settings or scoring aspects should be changed once the season has begun. Owners should draft their teams around those settings, to change them once the season has started could work to the advantage of some owners, and the disadvantage of others.
#3
Posted 14 April 2012 - 09:08 AM
I got thrown into this thing kind of late, so, I honestly didn't even realize their was a max innings pitched. Obviously that is my fault, and my drafting strategy would have changed. I still don't see where that 1600 max innings pitched is listed on the Yahoo rules, and I'm not even aware that a rulebook for this league exists, other than what is on yahoo. Can someone point me to where it shows the 1600 max innings ptiched ?
My vote would be for unlimited, followed by a raise to 1,900
My vote would be for unlimited, followed by a raise to 1,900
#4
Posted 14 April 2012 - 09:37 AM
Menudo, on 14 April 2012 - 09:08 AM, said:
I got thrown into this thing kind of late, so, I honestly didn't even realize their was a max innings pitched. Obviously that is my fault, and my drafting strategy would have changed. I still don't see where that 1600 max innings pitched is listed on the Yahoo rules, and I'm not even aware that a rulebook for this league exists, other than what is on yahoo. Can someone point me to where it shows the 1600 max innings ptiched ?
My vote would be for unlimited, followed by a raise to 1,900
My vote would be for unlimited, followed by a raise to 1,900
Under league all the way to the right under scoring and setting. that is basically the rules which was wiped out with the forum. written rules should be up within the next week.
#5
Posted 14 April 2012 - 10:03 AM
Probably should have been raised, but in the event that owner(s) were aware of this limit when the draft took place (and planned their draft/team accordingly), the best thing to do is probably to leave it as is. We'll just have to manage our rosters with that limit in mind.
I vote not to change.
I vote not to change.
#6
Posted 14 April 2012 - 12:07 PM
By the way, I'm absolutely fine with whatever is decided. It was my fault for not seeing the rules.
#7
Posted 14 April 2012 - 04:17 PM
i vote to raise the innings any where from 200 to 400 you guys decide any number is ok with me.
#8
Posted 12 August 2012 - 07:58 AM
no
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












