Initial Dynasty Draft
Posted 08 June 2012 - 01:54 PM
Any advice to help steer me towards a solid foundation for my dynasty squad?
Posted 08 June 2012 - 08:20 PM
Posted 12 June 2012 - 10:04 PM
Posted 12 June 2012 - 11:02 PM
Posted 12 June 2012 - 11:44 PM
RBs are the most volatile position, partly due to the higher risk of injury. I like Stafford, but if you're really sure that you could get Brees, that'd work, but he's the oldest player that I'd draft in a start up. I wouldn't take Brady.
I'd take AJGreen, Gronk or Graham over Ryan Mathews.
I'll elaborate even more if it you want me to.
Posted 13 June 2012 - 02:10 PM
I think I'm leaning towards Stafford because of his age and the fact he gets to throw to Megatron for many years to come. Matthews could be a stud back now that tolbert is gone, but he is also injury prone already & now adding more to his workload. So as of today, Stafford is my guy going into the draft. I'm hoping to get AJ, Nicks or Julio in round 2 on the way back. I'm also trying to trade up to the beginning of round 3 from the middle to snag a RB before the RB crop is dwindled. I think that gives me a solid foundation to build on going forward. If I stay in the middle of round 3 then I'll be seeing if Graham drops to me or looking at best available RB/WR at my spot.
Posted 14 June 2012 - 09:50 PM
Posted 23 June 2012 - 11:54 PM
cam is going #1 (he is a carolina fan), rodgers is 2, and another carolina fan traded up to #3 for cam without knowing he was going at #1 so his plan is stafford since he gave up so much to move up from #11. foster will definitely be either 4 or 5, so i'll get the one that is left of those 3. best possible scenario for me, i was upset when i got that draft spot but now i'm going crazy. now i just gotta hope AJ, nicks or julio makes it to me at #6 in the 2nd (12 team league). thanks for the advice on stafford and matthews, but looks like i wont need to make a decision in the 1st round after all.
Posted 25 June 2012 - 01:00 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users