127 replies to this topic

[DMD]

I think I fixed it but will check back on Sunday

[smithkt]

DMD, on 06 September 2012 - 12:14 AM, said:

I think I fixed it but will check back on Sunday

Looks like the 10 and 12 team leagues are now setup correctly, but the starting lineup for the 8 team league is still wrong.

This is what you have:

Starting Lineup Setup
Total Starters: 10
Number of Starting QBs: 1
Number of Starting RB+WR+TEs: 1
Number of Starting PKs: 1
Number of Starting Defs: 1

This is what you should have:

Starting Lineup Setup
Total Starters: 10
Number of Starting QBs: 1
Number of Starting RBs: 2
Number of Starting WRs: 3
Number of Starting TEs: 1
Number of Starting PKs: 1
Number of Starting Defs: 1

Edited by smithkt, 06 September 2012 - 07:20 AM.

[Brentastic]

smithkt, on 06 September 2012 - 07:19 AM, said:

Looks like the 10 and 12 team leagues are now setup correctly, but the starting lineup for the 8 team league is still wrong.

This is what you have:

Starting Lineup Setup
Total Starters: 10
Number of Starting QBs: 1
Number of Starting RB+WR+TEs: 1
Number of Starting PKs: 1
Number of Starting Defs: 1

This is what you should have:

Starting Lineup Setup
Total Starters: 10
Number of Starting QBs: 1
Number of Starting RBs: 2-3
Number of Starting WRs: 3-4
Number of Starting TEs: 1-2
Number of Starting PKs: 1
Number of Starting Defs: 1

Fixed to account for flex.  And you're right, it still appears to be wrong on the 8 man league.

[smithkt]

Brentastic, on 06 September 2012 - 08:41 AM, said:

Fixed to account for flex.  And you're right, it still appears to be wrong on the 8 man league.

Right.  Forgot about the flex.  In that case all of them are still wrong.  The 10 and 12 team leagues are not setup for a flex option.

[DMD]

all betterer

[buddahj]

Can we do waivers?

[tazinib1]

buddahj, on 06 September 2012 - 05:06 PM, said:

Can we do waivers?

nope

[buddahj]

tazinib1, on 06 September 2012 - 05:11 PM, said:

nope

interesting

[delusions of grandeur]

buddahj, on 06 September 2012 - 05:26 PM, said:

interesting

Set it and forget it!

BTW, I'm glad to see that my decision to only hold 1 kicker was in fact good strategy and not a rookie mistake. I figure I can make it up elsewhere, when most kickers only score within a point a game of one another...  It could maybe be more then that in a best-ball with 2, but not enough for me to not stock up with better value elsewhere.

[Zooty]

delusions of grandeur, on 06 September 2012 - 07:24 PM, said:

Set it and forget it!

BTW, I'm glad to see that my decision to only hold 1 kicker was in fact good strategy and not a rookie mistake. I figure I can make it up elsewhere, when most kickers only score within a point a game of one another...  It could maybe be more then that in a best-ball with 2, but not enough for me to not stock up with better value elsewhere.

unless he pulls a Nate Kaeding..

Its also total points not head to head

[tazinib1]

You'll want those points from the bye week at the end of the season I can assure you.

[MikesVikes]

Per DMD...

8 teams using WCOFF scoring.

18 rounds starting QB-2RB-3WR-TE-Flex-PK-DEF  (but was changed to 20 rounds based on public demand)

BEST BALL FORMAT (draft team and then MFL determines highest scorers - no waivers, no starts)


But From MFL Site...
Total Starters: 10
Number of Starting QBs: 1
Number of Starting RBs: 2
Number of Starting WRs: 3
Number of Starting TEs: 1
Number of Starting PKs: 1
Number of Starting Defs: 1

Should be...
Total Starters: 10
Number of Starting QBs: 1
Number of Starting RBs: 2-3
Number of Starting WRs: 3-4
Number of Starting TEs: 1-2
Number of Starting PKs: 1
Number of Starting Defs: 1

Edited by MikesVikes, 07 September 2012 - 12:02 PM.

[Brentastic]

MikesVikes, on 07 September 2012 - 11:59 AM, said:

Per DMD...

8 teams using WCOFF scoring.

18 rounds starting QB-2RB-3WR-TE-Flex-PK-DEF  (but was changed to 20 rounds based on public demand)

BEST BALL FORMAT (draft team and then MFL determines highest scorers - no waivers, no starts)


But From MFL Site...
Total Starters: 10
Number of Starting QBs: 1
Number of Starting RBs: 2
Number of Starting WRs: 3
Number of Starting TEs: 1
Number of Starting PKs: 1
Number of Starting Defs: 1

Should be...
Total Starters: 10
Number of Starting QBs: 1
Number of Starting RBs: 2-3
Number of Starting WRs: 3-4
Number of Starting TEs: 1-2
Number of Starting PKs: 1
Number of Starting Defs: 1

Right.  Still not fixed.  4th time's a charm

[MikesVikes]

Brentastic, on 07 September 2012 - 12:35 PM, said:

Right.  Still not fixed.  4th time's a charm

Working on projections until 3 am, like what kind of excuse is that?

[Zooty]

delusions of grandeur, on 06 September 2012 - 07:24 PM, said:

Set it and forget it!

BTW, I'm glad to see that my decision to only hold 1 kicker was in fact good strategy and not a rookie mistake. I figure I can make it up elsewhere, when most kickers only score within a point a game of one another...  It could maybe be more then that in a best-ball with 2, but not enough for me to not stock up with better value elsewhere.

don't you have to wait till after the season to rule it a victory?

[tazinib1]

Zooty, on 07 September 2012 - 08:55 PM, said:

don't you have to wait till after the season to rule it a victory?

For the first time ever, I went with 1 PK. After that blunder of picking Bishop, I was forced to pick a bye week PK or a bye week CB/S. Kind of a no-brainer. Hope that +/-10pts doesn't bite me in the ass.

[Zooty]

tazinib1, on 07 September 2012 - 09:09 PM, said:

For the first time ever, I went with 1 PK. After that blunder of picking Bishop, I was forced to pick a bye week PK or a bye week CB/S. Kind of a no-brainer. Hope that +/-10pts doesn't bite me in the ass.

you know Bishop is a LB not a CB/S?

[Brentastic]

MikesVikes, on 07 September 2012 - 01:36 PM, said:

Working on projections until 3 am, like what kind of excuse is that?

I thought DMD was sitting beach side with cocktails after the billion dollar buy-out

[tazinib1]

Zooty, on 07 September 2012 - 09:11 PM, said:

you know Bishop is a LB not a CB/S?

Of course but since I then had to pick yet ANOTHER LB, that took away my extra bye week spot for my PK.

Edited by tazinib1, 08 September 2012 - 01:08 AM.

[delusions of grandeur]

Zooty, on 06 September 2012 - 08:10 PM, said:

unless he pulls a Nate Kaeding..

Its also total points not head to head

Zooty, on 07 September 2012 - 08:55 PM, said:

don't you have to wait till after the season to rule it a victory?

Maybe I should have said not-completely stupid strategy.

Good info on it being total points, but isn't that even more reason why only taking 1 kicker might not be a bad strategy?

That means I don't have to worry about a kicker losing me a week, I just need my other players to make up for the points I lose at the end of season.  Again, if kickers normally only score within a point of another over the course of the season, then I'm not sure that a combo of 2 kickers is going to make more than a 2-3 PPG difference (unless like you said, he pulls a Nate Kaeding, but it was a calculated gamble for more potentially valuable players on roster)

[Brentastic]

Brentastic, on 07 September 2012 - 12:35 PM, said:

Right.  Still not fixed.  4th time's a charm

I'm assuming we can retroactively set the lineup requirements should it not get corrected by the end of Monday night games?

[MikesVikes]

Brentastic, on 09 September 2012 - 10:18 AM, said:

I'm assuming we can retroactively set the lineup requirements should it not get corrected by the end of Monday night games?

Yes.  Should be able to.

[tazinib1]

I'm kinda wondering why OGLETREE is allowed to count for this weeks games when he was drafted AFTER Wednesdays game. No worries, just kinda odd is all.

[Brentastic]

tazinib1, on 09 September 2012 - 10:42 PM, said:

I'm kinda wondering why OGLETREE is allowed to count for this weeks games when he was drafted AFTER Wednesdays game. No worries, just kinda odd is all.

I think you're getting confused with your leagues.  We finished drafting well before the first game.

[tazinib1]

Not the IDP league