Footballjoe Posted September 5, 2013 Share Posted September 5, 2013 Interesting projection on Redskins Fletcher and Riley. Anyone else expected to get a tackle? Gotta agree with you though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PPIchamp Posted September 5, 2013 Share Posted September 5, 2013 I wasn't suprised to see London near/at the top, but Riley at #3 was unexpected to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted September 5, 2013 Share Posted September 5, 2013 I wasn't suprised to see London near/at the top, but Riley at #3 was unexpected to see. Just to clarify...I don't make the rankings...those are generated off the projections that I make which in turn are based on the scoring system you use in myHuddle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Footballjoe Posted September 5, 2013 Author Share Posted September 5, 2013 (edited) Found this in one of my leagues for 2012. Games where both players had good weeks: 17.5/15.5 (week 2); 20.5 /17.5 (week 30); 28/17.5 (week 5); 22/20.5 (week 6); 21/15.5 (week 11); 14.5/21 (week 14) and 25.5/18 (week 16) Edited September 5, 2013 by Footballjoe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted September 6, 2013 Share Posted September 6, 2013 Found this in one of my leagues for 2012. Games where both players had good weeks: 17.5/15.5 (week 2); 20.5 /17.5 (week 30); 28/17.5 (week 5); 22/20.5 (week 6); 21/15.5 (week 11); 14.5/21 (week 14) and 25.5/18 (week 16) now go check which of those weeks were at home....Riley might be a stretch, but I don't think Fletcher is at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring Back Pat!!! Posted September 6, 2013 Share Posted September 6, 2013 How do these work? Seems to be some guys not listed that you would think should be. Dashon Goldson comes to mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PPIchamp Posted September 6, 2013 Share Posted September 6, 2013 Good projection on Woodyard. He went 5-5 instead of 7-3 on tackles, but made up or it with a half sack and a PD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 I wasn't suprised to see London near/at the top, but Riley at #3 was unexpected to see. Projected Riley for 8-7-0 and he finished 8-7-1...(missed the sack & fumble recovery...he ended up 3rd in my rankings and finished as the #1 ranked LB...Projected Fletcher for 11-6-0 and he finished with 6-7-0 so I'm not happy I was 5 high on his solos...he ranked as my #1 LB but finished as #12(19 points)...all in all I'll take projections like those any and every time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 How do these work? Seems to be some guys not listed that you would think should be. Dashon Goldson comes to mind. What I try to do is project players that I figure owners will be starting or thinking about starting...so I could project someone for 1 solo which wouldn't make them rank in the top 50 but they get projected to hopefully keep someone from starting them. A guy like Goldson wasn't projected simply because I didn't see him as someone that would be started in many leagues and I didn't see any upside in the matchup....he finished with a solid 5-2-0 but I never saw that coming against the Jets passing "attack" Did that explanation help? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PPIchamp Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 That's awesome, right on again man! I'm in one league that only has 2 IDP flex spots, so I was able to pick up Fletcher, he was definitley solid. Looking forward to what D. Butler's gonna do in Philly this week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.