Scorcher Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 Did not see Jacqiuzz Rodgers ranked. Is it me or has he been omitted? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorcher Posted October 22, 2013 Author Share Posted October 22, 2013 (edited) Did anyone see Rodgers in the RB rankings? If so what number? Edited October 22, 2013 by Scorcher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 Obviously an error. I'm sure it will be corrected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koralkillers Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 Didnt see him..must be a mistake..then again Bears D was ranked #1??thats just silly.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j2v Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 Must have been lost in a cut & paste debacle. Error has been fixed. As for the Bears, if 4 defensive TDs (most in the NFL), 10 INTs (3rd in NFL) and the constant threat of Devin Hester in the return game don't warrant a high ranking, your defensive scoring must be pretty unique. 2V Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorcher Posted October 22, 2013 Author Share Posted October 22, 2013 Must have been lost in a cut & paste debacle. Error has been fixed. As for the Bears, if 4 defensive TDs (most in the NFL), 10 INTs (3rd in NFL) and the constant threat of Devin Hester in the return game don't warrant a high ranking, your defensive scoring must be pretty unique. 2V Thanks, what about Bernard Pierce? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dougsul Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 Without a doubt in any scoring league, KC should be number 1. How is R Rice ranked in the top 20? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koralkillers Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 Say what you want about Bears Defense,Top 10 for sure..but #1 overall..no way.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron677 Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 (edited) Must have been lost in a cut & paste debacle. Error has been fixed. As for the Bears, if 4 defensive TDs (most in the NFL), 10 INTs (3rd in NFL) and the constant threat of Devin Hester in the return game don't warrant a high ranking, your defensive scoring must be pretty unique. 2V Sure it warrants a high ranking but how the heck can they be number 1 when they're giving up so many points game after game (45 against Washington!). Kansas City has clearly been the number 1 defense this year without any shadow of a doubt. KC defense is putting up RB1 numbers this year and have 30+ more points than the 2nd highest scoring defense Seattle. They're like the Jimmy Graham of defenses. Did you see their performance against Oakland? 10 sacks, 7 points allowed, defensive td, 3 ints, 2 fumble recoveries. And Terrelle Pryor isn't exactly an easy guy to sack Edited October 22, 2013 by Ron677 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koralkillers Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 This weeks Commentary From The Edge column pretty much sums up the Bears and there defense in the Misery Index... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrab Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 Sure it warrants a high ranking but how the heck can they be number 1 when they're giving up so many points game after game (45 against Washington!). Kansas City has clearly been the number 1 defense this year without any shadow of a doubt. KC defense is putting up RB1 numbers this year and have 30+ more points than the 2nd highest scoring defense Seattle. They're like the Jimmy Graham of defenses. Did you see their performance against Oakland? 10 sacks, 7 points allowed, defensive td, 3 ints, 2 fumble recoveries. And Terrelle Pryor isn't exactly an easy guy to sack A lot depends on scoring system. Most commonly give points for sacks and turnovers. But some do little for points allowed, while others will have a huge bonus (maybe 10 points) for a shutout. Then add in that some play defense only, others include special teams (hence the point about the threat of Hester). Still looking at KC in my league (max 4 for a shutout, 0 if give up over 30) KC is #1(89 points), with CHI #5(55), and most of that is due to the higher number of sacks by KC (25) and the rest (about 10) to their much lower points allowed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Company of Heroes Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 I don't know that I can really nit-pick RoS rankings, much less defense rankings. Sure a few can seem out of whack, but defenses in particular are more about who they are playing. As such, I often use the strength of schedule tool to find usable defenses throughout the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavinRJohnson Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 RoS rankings are probably my fav weekly feature on the site. I wonder if people know that when you click on a position, you get a nice little upgrade and downgrade tidbit. Been meaning to post this cudo all season, finally got around to it...Thanks, 2V Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wpayers Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 The ROS is indispensable at waiver time. I set my claim order based on a combination or my roster, pending match-ups, SOS and ROS. Great tool! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 People really love to nitpick (cough bitch cough) about stuff 'round here. As with weekly rankings, projections, whatever it may be... take it with a grain of salt. Recognize that many leagues have different types of scoring. My guess the RoS rankings are based off a very, very STANDARD type of league. As for defensive scoring, not all give/take away points for points scored against. Use tools like this as a guide and make your own determinations. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorcher Posted October 22, 2013 Author Share Posted October 22, 2013 (edited) I like ROS rankings as well , that's why I wanted to see where Rodgers would be. Also would like to point out that when asking a question about any of the sigh features the response is very quick. Edited October 22, 2013 by Scorcher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 I like ROS rankings as well , that's why I wanted to see where Rodgers would be. Also would like to point out that when asking a question about any of the sigh features the response is very quick. Sorry I didn't mean for my reply to be directed at everyone responding here... if there's a glaring omission, that is obviously well within reason to post. But the bitchin' n' whinin' about where a certain player (usually THEIR player) is ranked can get ... well ... tedious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delusions of grandeur Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 (edited) Sorry I didn't mean for my reply to be directed at everyone responding here... if there's a glaring omission, that is obviously well within reason to post. But the bitchin' n' whinin' about where a certain player (usually THEIR player) is ranked can get ... well ... tedious. And they typically seem to gravitate right for the number ranking, while not even looking at the explanation. After looking at the explanation, then one could start a productive thread debating a premise, rather than an unproductive one questioning the site because they fixated on the ranking not the reasoning (which is the only reason I use pay sites, for a second/third/etc. opinion with things I might have missed) (ETA: like darin said, this isn't directed at this thread, just an observation and suggestion) Edited October 22, 2013 by delusions of grandeur 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorcher Posted October 22, 2013 Author Share Posted October 22, 2013 Sorry I didn't mean for my reply to be directed at everyone responding here... if there's a glaring omission, that is obviously well within reason to post. But the bitchin' n' whinin' about where a certain player (usually THEIR player) is ranked can get ... well ... tedious. No problem, I understood your post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.