david.cassaro3 Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 I have Foster & Sanders, given their uncertain in jury length & risk should I consider this as a good trade to make? I have Forte and Terrence West along with Ben Tate other then Foster in a PPR League. Also I counter offered the same trade with him adding Percy Harvin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcal42 Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 I would say it would be a good idea to acquire charles if possible. Foster can be good but charles put up more consistent numbers last year. As far as sanders goes, he will probably get a good amount of targets for the next couple of weeks until Welker comes back. But once Welker is back he will be behind Thomas, Welker and Thomas for receptions in the Denver Offense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david.cassaro3 Posted September 16, 2014 Author Share Posted September 16, 2014 I decided to take the trade of Foster, Mike Wallace & Ben Tate for Jamaal Charles, Percy Harvin & Doug Martin...Might get veto'd might not but I don't think I'll be mad either way this goes down and I hope the upside of my trade really shows itself. Thanks for your opinions I appreciate it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crankyrayhanky Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 You wanting hurtCharles can be understood as his resume is alluring, but who in their right mind wants DMart? Yuck Arian looks awesome and Sanders is a solid start every week. Bad idea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.