Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Mark Ingram


sksmith
 Share

Recommended Posts

What's his role upon return next week? Back to starter? Did Khiry do enough to make it a bigger committee than it was first 2 games of season? Is Ingram a RB1? Their remaining schedule is less than daunting, with fantasy playoff weeks being very inviting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not an RB1 regardless.

 

I think he's the starter, but it's still a mess. Thomas just made it an official double-stamped no erasies cluster**** the rest of the season. NO has zero reason to treat Ingram (or any of them) as a bellcow. Keep them all fresh, don't give the D any keys, and deflate any FA value for a guy you might re-sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pierre was always going to be the FJax to their Spiller, though? He just had his one big game of the year. Not that I'm wholly disagreeing with you, just not sure that 1 game terribly effects Thomas' usage going forward...

 

That said, value game!

 

Ingram v D Martin?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not an RB1 regardless.

 

I think he's the starter, but it's still a mess. Thomas just made it an official double-stamped no erasies cluster**** the rest of the season. NO has zero reason to treat Ingram (or any of them) as a bellcow. Keep them all fresh, don't give the D any keys, and deflate any FA value for a guy you might re-sign.

 

 

THIS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not an RB1 regardless.

 

I think he's the starter, but it's still a mess. Thomas just made it an official double-stamped no erasies cluster**** the rest of the season. NO has zero reason to treat Ingram (or any of them) as a bellcow. Keep them all fresh, don't give the D any keys, and deflate any FA value for a guy you might re-sign.

 

 

The Saints have 2 reasons to treat Ingram as a bellcow. Week 1 and Week 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not an RB1 regardless.

 

I think he's the starter, but it's still a mess. Thomas just made it an official double-stamped no erasies cluster**** the rest of the season. NO has zero reason to treat Ingram (or any of them) as a bellcow. Keep them all fresh, don't give the D any keys, and deflate any FA value for a guy you might re-sign.

 

 

Have to agree with this. I don't see any reason why they would change from their original plan at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not an RB1 regardless.

 

I think he's the starter, but it's still a mess. Thomas just made it an official double-stamped no erasies cluster**** the rest of the season. NO has zero reason to treat Ingram (or any of them) as a bellcow. Keep them all fresh, don't give the D any keys, and deflate any FA value for a guy you might re-sign.

 

He certainly was a RB1 the first two weeks. Once he's back to 100% he very well could be again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want any part of this backfield. I dropped Khiry Robinson the other day. I would certainly hold on to Ingram for the goal-line carries that I think he will receive once he's back, but I wouldn't rely on him as much more than a flex or low-end RB2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information