NEMS Posted December 1, 2014 Share Posted December 1, 2014 PPR. I've already got the dubya locked up. I need about 31 points to win an additional $60 in my league for scoring the most points on the season. Who has more big-game potential here? Wallace or Landry? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbforbes Posted December 2, 2014 Share Posted December 2, 2014 I played Wallace over DeAndre Hopkins, but what do I know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShaDynasty Posted December 2, 2014 Share Posted December 2, 2014 Big game potential definitely goes to Wallace, he can get behind the secondary and break off 60+ yard plays, albeit not likely. Meanwhile Landry runs shorter routes imo, so if you're swinging for the fences I'd take Wallace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BA Baracus Posted December 2, 2014 Share Posted December 2, 2014 I think tonight is Wallace's night. He should see the more favorable coverage. The potentially fatal flaw is that Tannehill throws a really poor deep ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted December 2, 2014 Share Posted December 2, 2014 Neither one will get 31 points but Wallace has the most big-game potential. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpr103 Posted December 2, 2014 Share Posted December 2, 2014 PPR, Landry is looking like the guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrab Posted December 2, 2014 Share Posted December 2, 2014 Hindsight I know, but from watching a few Dolphin games they don't throw deep very often, practically not at all. So while Wallace may be a deep ball threat, he isn't used for that much, and Landry seems to be the top WR right now. Targets last 5 games Wallace = 8-8-7-5-11 (total 39) Landry = 6-10-5-11-11 (total 43) Wallace does have a slightly higher average per reception, but noting eye popping. Landry seems to catch more of his targets (32 of 43 vs 22 of 39 in last 5 games). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rileyrott Posted December 2, 2014 Share Posted December 2, 2014 To be fair, Wallace did drop a sure-fire touchdown (had he played more aggressively). But Tannehill overthrew Landry a couple of times on what could have been long gainers. So, it could've been better for both Wallace and Landry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpr103 Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 So, it could've been better for both Wallace and Landry. Like, if they were on the Packers. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.