Who would you rather have at TE, J.Hill or C.Fleener?

[irish]

I have a choice to grab one, so which should I take and why?

[Zooty]

Hill

 

Fleener has t deal with Allen for playing time and looks. Not to mention the deep WR group/

 

Hill has to deal with Watson. Don't believe the hype. If Payton thinks he's the answer then he's asking the wrong question. Outside of Cooks and maybe Spiller they only have an aging Colston.

[Big Country]

Hill

 

Fleener has t deal with Allen for playing time and looks. Not to mention the deep WR group/

 

Hill has to deal with Watson. Don't believe the hype. If Payton thinks he's the answer then he's asking the wrong question. Outside of Cooks and maybe Spiller they only have an aging Colston.

 

I agree with this, I think Hill has the better upside and also a lower floor. I think the most realistic expectation for Hill is that he hits low end starter production levels (around TE10-15) with a couple big games sprinkled in.

[robotpimp]

Yep I like Hill as well.. you know how Brees uses the TE especially in the red zone and down the middle of the field.

Brees goes outside and inside throwing to his TE a lot.

 

Fleener and Allen could be a nightmare to work with if Luck switches between them or excludes them outright in games. Indy has too many options and Luck uses everything including rushing himself. Josh's potential to be a consistent weekly contributor makes him more tantalizing.. Watching Allen catch a TD over Fleener would drive me crazy.. that alone is enough. Most likely they both end up with similar stats at years end I think game in and out Hill will be involved weekly as Fleener will be sharing/targets looks with Allen.