Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Stedman Bailey shot in Miami


Big John
 Share

Recommended Posts

Separating a player from his team during a suspension is asinine. Losing 4 weeks of pay is what deters a player from doing things that lead to suspension. Giving him a 4 week vacation is only asking for more problems. I wouldn't be surprised if this incident is what finally causes that rule to change.

Grown adults shouldn't be expected to govern themselves accordingly when out in the world? What about the big gap in activity with the team between seasons, is that also asking for more problems?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grown adults shouldn't be expected to govern themselves accordingly when out in the world? What about the big gap in activity with the team between seasons, is that also asking for more problems?

In theory, you are correct. But there are soooo many examples of professional athletes being unable to manage their lives that the NFL really should reconsider the structure of the rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In theory, you are correct. But there are soooo many examples of professional athletes being unable to manage their lives that the NFL really should reconsider the structure of the rule.

Or maybe, just maybe..these millionaires that play a game for a living could take responsibility for their own lives and livelihoods like those of us do that are making peanuts in comparison. Crazy..huh?
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In theory, you are correct. But there are soooo many examples of professional athletes being unable to manage their lives that the NFL really should reconsider the structure of the rule.

Protect your assets as best you can, I get that. But in the end, these are grown men who are accountable for themselves. I have nothing wrong with teams having a guidance counselor of sorts for incoming rookies or players of any seniority, probably a good idea that already exists. The NFL nor the teams should or can be babysitters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like he's in a car with young family members - not out in an alley with some thugs. He gets shot.

 

Not sure how you protect someone from being in a car with his family, or from what I'm reading, where he has not been responsible.

 

You say "in a car with his family" like having his family in the car would prevent him from doing something stupid. I do not know what happened but it is not out of the realm of possibilities that he instigated something even from his car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You say "in a car with his family" like having his family in the car would prevent him from doing something stupid. I do not know what happened but it is not out of the realm of possibilities that he instigated something even from his car.

True. I reserve all judgment at this point - perhaps you have it all figured out already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True. I reserve all judgment at this point - perhaps you have it all figured out already.

 

Nope, I already said I don't know what happened. But the fact that he had family in the car sadly can't be used as a measuring stick of his good or bad behavior - you can't assume his behavior was innocent because he had his family with him. Your comment about him not being in an alley with some thugs seemed to imply that the presence of his family should convince us that he was not behaving badly or that he wasn't with bad people.

 

At this point what really happened doesn't seem to be known, certainly I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Nope, I already said I don't know what happened. But the fact that he had family in the car sadly can't be used as a measuring stick of his good or bad behavior - you can't assume his behavior was innocent because he had his family with him. Your comment about him not being in an alley with some thugs seemed to imply that the presence of his family should convince us that he was not behaving badly or that he wasn't with bad people.

 

At this point what really happened doesn't seem to be known, certainly I don't know.

You CAN assume his behavior was innocent because he had his family in the car. It doesn't mean it's true. He's trying to giving him the benefit of the doubt, in which I admire, when so many others trying to attack without knowing the totality of circumstances.

Edited by Shaft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How the hell do you get shot in the head and not have a life threatening injury?

 

This is what I was wondering. I have heard of freak shots that hit at a crazy angle and deflect off the skull and exit on the other side of the head without ever penetrating the skull, but that seems unlikely. Sounds like he got pretty lucky, or as lucky as possible considering he got shot in the head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This is what I was wondering. I have heard of freak shots that hit at a crazy angle and deflect off the skull and exit on the other side of the head without ever penetrating the skull, but that seems unlikely. Sounds like he got pretty lucky, or as lucky as possible considering he got shot in the head.

The truth is stranger than fiction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14219437/stedman-bailey-st-louis-rams-shot

 

"Police did not describe the nature of Bailey's injuries, but a source confirmed to ESPN's Josina Anderson that he was shot twice in the head."

 

TWICE!! How the heck is this guy alive?

Face shots?

 

Or small caliber such as a .22 or .380. Glancing shots from either of those can fail to penetrate the skull and instead cause bad skull fractures. Still an open brain injury but not the type expected from a projectile.

 

I've seen more than one person take a shot to the face and it destroy extensive soft tissue without violated the skull at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Face shots?

 

Or small caliber such as a .22 or .380. Glancing shots from either of those can fail to penetrate the skull and instead cause bad skull fractures. Still an open brain injury but not the type expected from a projectile.

 

I've seen more than one person take a shot to the face and it destroy extensive soft tissue without violated the skull at all.

 

You've seen more than one person get shot in the face?! What the crap man, you need to get out of that neighborhood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information