Rightbug Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 I just picked up Smallwood as a depth move but someone dropped Matt Bryant to the wire during his bye week. I've got Justin Tucker but the Ravens struggles have been hampering his output lately. Should I drop Smallwood for Bryant? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdybaz Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 Yeah I definitely would, you are 4-5 deep at RB already, and Bryant would seemingly be an upgrade in that offense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gronk87 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?/topic/478806-going-crazy-will-help-in-return/#entry4302468 No. Kickers don't make that much of a difference Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdybaz Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 Bullcrap kickers don't make that much of a difference. I just won by.64 points this past weekend... kickers aren't worthy of being chosen until the later rounds, but once you've seen how the season is shaking out, it behooves you to grab a higher scoring kicker if you can. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montana is da Man Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 No no, no need for that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stickers Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 why not drop tucker instead of having 2 kickers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
medalofhonor Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 No point in having two kickers on your roster. Atlanta is a better offense which can stay on the field for a longer time. So definitely pick up Bryant. But drop Tucker for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piranha-z Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 No point in having two kickers on your roster. Atlanta is a better offense which can stay on the field for a longer time. So definitely pick up Bryant. But drop Tucker for him. Right on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oG1KeNoBi Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 Yeah Idk why you would keep Tucker, especially if you feel as though he is struggling. Add Bryant and drop Tucker. Please asssit: http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?/topic/478820-wdis-as-wr2/#entry4302542 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorcher Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 (edited) I would drop Tucker for Bryant and go with him the rest of the season. Bryant plays in a better environment weather -wise and towards the end of the season that makes a real difference. Smallwood is the man right now in Philly and will get the majority of the reps. Even if you don't play Smallwood why would you give someone else in your league the opportunity to pick him up? for right now , Smallwood has a lot of value. Edited November 23, 2016 by Scorcher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaWitzMie Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 Ya drop Tucker for Bryant. I did today Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorcher Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 Bullcrap kickers don't make that much of a difference. I just won by.64 points this past weekend... kickers aren't worthy of being chosen until the later rounds, but once you've seen how the season is shaking out, it behooves you to grab a higher scoring kicker if you can. If the rest of your team is solid you wouldn't need a kicker to help you win by .64, besides who can say that it was your kicker that won the game for you? I won one game this week by .1, it was at the last minute when Lamar Miller went over 100 yards and I got a bonus for that. Lamar Miller was my last player but the player who won it for me was Rob Kelly the night before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oG1KeNoBi Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 If the rest of your team is solid you wouldn't need a kicker to help you win by .64, besides who can say that it was your kicker that won the game for you? I won one game this week by .1, it was at the last minute when Lamar Miller went over 100 yards and I got a bonus for that. Lamar Miller was my last player but the player who won it for me was Rob Kelly the night before. Yeah I get what you're saying. Personally I think kickers shouldn't even be part of fantasy football but I wasn't the commish in any of my leagues this year. However, since they are a part of fantasy football, it only makes sense to try and obtain the ones who score the most points.....solid roster or not. I can definitely say they have greatly contributed in some of my wins and I can confidently say that they have contributed in some of my losses via my opponent's kicker scoring close to 20 points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.