Wolverines Fan Posted May 1, 2017 Share Posted May 1, 2017 (edited) John Fox was supposedly in the dark about the Trubisky pick. http://chi.247sports.com/Bolt/Report-Its-really-bad-between-John-Fox-and-Ryan-Pace-52575870 And Mike Glennon is mad. http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/8374/mike-glennon This is going to be a great 2017 season. Edited May 1, 2017 by Wolverines Fan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flemingd Posted May 1, 2017 Share Posted May 1, 2017 Mike Glennon got $18.5M for one season. Boo friggin' who. All he has to do is play well and he'll make $30M more because someone will trade for that contract if he does. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrab Posted May 1, 2017 Share Posted May 1, 2017 Is there a new award for being the most dysfunctional frachise in the NFL? If not why are the Bears and Bills trying to hard to take the crown? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted May 1, 2017 Share Posted May 1, 2017 Trubisky's statements after the draft about him having hardly any contact with the Bears in the pre-draft process was pretty damning. Probably one of the worst draft decisions I've ever seen. I'm currently considering becoming a "free agent" in terms of my loyalties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelredd9 Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 22 hours ago, darin3 said: Trubisky's statements after the draft about him having hardly any contact with the Bears in the pre-draft process was pretty damning. Probably one of the worst draft decisions I've ever seen. I'm currently considering becoming a "free agent" in terms of my loyalties. If the Bears had shown a lot of interest in Trubisky, it might have caused other teams to try to trade to the 2 spot. If Trubisky is good, then this was a good move. Why do you hate Trubisky so much? In the film I've watched, Trubisky looks poised. He is an accurate thrower with a quick release. And he is mobile and athletic. He looks similar to Aaron Rodgers to me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 (edited) 6 minutes ago, michaelredd9 said: If the Bears had shown a lot of interest in Trubisky, it might have caused other teams to try to trade to the 2 spot. If Trubisky is good, then this was a good move. Why do you hate Trubisky so much? In the film I've watched, Trubisky looks poised. He is an accurate thrower with a quick release. And he is mobile and athletic. He looks similar to Aaron Rodgers to me. There's ways to get a hold of a player without letting other teams know what you're up to. Athletically, he compares favorably to Rodgers. Between the ears and as a leader, he has a LONG way to go. Edited May 2, 2017 by darin3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelredd9 Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 Just now, darin3 said: There's ways to get a hold of a player without letting other teams know what you're up to. You mean like Snapchat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papa Deuce Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 (edited) Glennon ought to be glad to even be in football..... he is not worthy of being an $18M QB..... not even 12M. But this whole drafting at 2, with it being Trubisky, seems like someone was on acid when they made this deal. He would definitely have fallen to them at at 3 and the could have kept their picks intact. Edited May 4, 2017 by Papa Deuce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 18 hours ago, Papa Deuce said: Glennon ought to be glad to even be in football..... he is not worthy of being an $18M QB..... not even 12M. But this whole drafting at 2, with it being Trubisky, seems like someone was on acid when they made this deal. He would definitely have fallen to them at at 3 and the could have kept their picks intact. That's obviously your opinion. The Bears have done some dumb ish here but the signing of Glennon was actually not one of them. Of course that's my opinion. Glennon looked pretty good in spot duty for the Bucs. The Bears flinched HARD here. They thought there was a chance SF was taking him OR possibly even trading the pick to CLE since they had the ammo. So, the old adage "you do what it takes to get your guy" applies here. It just ended up being wholly unnecessary. And dumb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CowboysDiehard Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 All Glennon has to do is wet his thumb and start stackin'. I only wish I had his problems! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blips Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 The only thing that will help the Bears is a change of ownership. It worked for the Blackhawks and the Cubs. This McCaskey family has no clue what they are doing or how to run a franchise in this day and age. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stethant Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 21 hours ago, blips said: The only thing that will help the Bears is a change of ownership. It worked for the Blackhawks and the Cubs. This McCaskey family has no clue what they are doing or how to run a franchise in this day and age. Sad but true. Also true of the Browns, 49ers, Chargers, and Rams at a minimum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.