Sgt. Ryan Posted September 11, 2004 Share Posted September 11, 2004 as heavy favorites. OU and tex-ass will once again save the conference Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meat Face Posted September 11, 2004 Share Posted September 11, 2004 (edited) and kansas Edited September 11, 2004 by Meat Face Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG A Posted September 11, 2004 Share Posted September 11, 2004 Hahahahahahahahahaha. Fresno and/or Boise State could win the Big 12. We will see how good OU is when they play a division one team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
URLACHERisGOD Posted September 11, 2004 Share Posted September 11, 2004 (edited) Hahahahahahahahahaha. Fresno and/or Boise State could win the Big 12. We will see how good OU is when they play a division one team. 406080[/snapback] You sure will...and your " " will turn into a " :bigshock: ". Edited September 11, 2004 by URLACHERisGOD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akfatha Posted September 11, 2004 Share Posted September 11, 2004 man im a husker & was at that game. we had 478 yards to their 238 or something, but we had 5 turnovers that were drive killers and they scored on 4 of our 5 turnovers. but dude, big 12 north is pathetic. mizzou to troy, ksu to fresno, neb to usm. ou sucks tho. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG A Posted September 11, 2004 Share Posted September 11, 2004 You sure will...and your " " will turn into a " :bigshock: ". 406092[/snapback] I will give them the credit they deserve when they do. Hard to gage how good a team is until they play an opponent that fields a team of men. Would be very embarrassing for you and Sgt. Ryan if Oregon wins in Norman next week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintsFanUnfortunately Posted September 11, 2004 Share Posted September 11, 2004 man im a husker & was at that game. we had.... but dude, big 12 north is pathetic. mizzou to troy, ksu to fresno, neb to usm. ou sucks tho. 406109[/snapback] Now there is a Big 12 fan that I agree with! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Trick Posted September 11, 2004 Share Posted September 11, 2004 I'm an MU fan and I'm embarassed as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
polksalet Posted September 11, 2004 Share Posted September 11, 2004 AHem, GIGEM!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Ryan Posted September 19, 2004 Author Share Posted September 19, 2004 I will give them the credit they deserve when they do. Hard to gage how good a team is until they play an opponent that fields a team of men. Would be very embarrassing for you and Sgt. Ryan if Oregon wins in Norman next week. 406116[/snapback] 31-7, another one bites the dust, and this time a WAC-10 team that according to ESPN, I didnt do the research, has won more games in the past 3 yrs coming into this yr than any other Wac-10 team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skylive5 Posted September 19, 2004 Share Posted September 19, 2004 31-7, another one bites the dust, and this time a WAC-10 team that according to ESPN, I didnt do the research, has won more games in the past 3 yrs coming into this yr than any other Wac-10 team. 425403[/snapback] PAC! A PAC-10 team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Ryan Posted September 19, 2004 Author Share Posted September 19, 2004 PAC! A PAC-10 team. 425817[/snapback] Sky, Im fully aware of what the proper name of the conference is. I just refuse to give respect to the conference thus I call them Wac-10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG A Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 Sky, Im fully aware of what the proper name of the conference is. I just refuse to give respect to the conference thus I call them Wac-10. 426501[/snapback] He calls them the WAC-10 because he is scared of them. Oregon may have a great 3 year record, but they are clearly not the class of the PAC 10. Unless you are blind, USC has that distinction. Remember, they won the championship last year, not OU. Respect should be given since your team was incapable of winning a big game when it counted. Spare me your excuses, I have heard them before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG A Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 When you root for a team that finally wins something, feel free to argue your case. But Arizona has and still is pathetic at best. And USC didnt play for the National title, it was handed to them by some sportswriters. LSU actually won the National Chamionship game, I give no respect to a team OU would put 50 on and defeat by 30.And Oregon is about par for the course for the Wac-10. That conference changes whos good- whos bad so often no one can predict who deserves credit and who does not. USC had a gravey schedule last yr and lost the only game that was even somewhat difficult. So why would they deserve anything. By my estimates how can they even claim to be Wac-10 champs when they couldnt beat Cal, let alone National Champs...... 427676[/snapback] I root for AZ because I lived there and grew up rooting for them win or lose. That is what being a fan is, not jumping on and off band wagons or sooner schooners because of dissapointing seasons. I also root for the PAC 10. Yes, the only human aspect voted for the clear #1 and the bcs comp put the wrong team in the championship. Clearly your talking out of your a$$ regarding your prediction of some fantasy game being played in your head with OU putting up 50 points on USC. You shouldn't even be debating the point. Your team lost the big bcs game. Hang your head in shame and bow down to USC. #1 last year and still #1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiL10(s)ArEaJoKe Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 PAC! A PAC-10 team. 425817[/snapback] Allright if I call them the LiL 10 west? if not thats what I'm gonna call em anyway, just like the LiL 10 north!!! My reasoning for the LiL part is b/c they are not grown up enough to play a championship game for their conference title!!! 10 teams is plenty to split into two divisions 5 and 5 and play an extra game each year to decide the champ!!! So until they do you will just have to see WAC,LiL, or whatever comes next..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG A Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 I will give them the credit they deserve when they do. Hard to gage how good a team is until they play an opponent that fields a team of men. Would be very embarrassing for you and Sgt. Ryan if Oregon wins in Norman next week. 406116[/snapback] OU looked good and I give them credit. They dominated a bad team at home once again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG A Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 hmm.. sounds alot like what USC did. Only problem is USC wont play a top 5 team this yr, unless it loses to Cal, and Cal jumps about 10 teams. 428879[/snapback] I agree with you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr. b00m Posted September 22, 2004 Share Posted September 22, 2004 (edited) Embarassed is certainly an overstatement, both teams just had a bit of bad luck, but I wouldn't say Embarassed, end of story. Edited September 22, 2004 by mr. b00m Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
URLACHERisGOD Posted September 22, 2004 Share Posted September 22, 2004 end of story. 434361[/snapback] Fat chance that statement pans out to be true. End of story? Wait 'til Sarge gets whiff of that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akfatha Posted September 22, 2004 Share Posted September 22, 2004 Fat chance that statement pans out to be true. End of story? Wait 'til Sarge gets whiff of that one. 434397[/snapback] fat chance neb had bad luck? oi vey, how i love to see fools who have no idea anything about nebraska except the SCORE post their comments about the team. have a good time with that call buddy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
URLACHERisGOD Posted September 22, 2004 Share Posted September 22, 2004 fat chance neb had bad luck? oi vey, how i love to see fools who have no idea anything about nebraska except the SCORE post their comments about the team. have a good time with that call buddy 434437[/snapback] What exactly are you getting at here? Am I missing something? Are you under the assumption I don't know anything about Nebraska football? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
URLACHERisGOD Posted September 22, 2004 Share Posted September 22, 2004 fat chance neb had bad luck? oi vey, how i love to see fools who have no idea anything about nebraska except the SCORE post their comments about the team. have a good time with that call buddy 434437[/snapback] Not to mention, your comment is completely of base and indeed you are the one that looks to be the fool. Look at the part of the comment I quoted then cross-reference that with the actual post. mr. bOOm said "end of story" as if he had the last word and what he said was going to be the final word on the subject. That is the comment that my post was referring to. "Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son." --Dean Wermer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffeeman Posted September 22, 2004 Share Posted September 22, 2004 Hey UIG - what do the #s in your sigline mean? I think I know who 54 is, but the others...? And while we're here, since you're a CHI-town homer, will I be okay with TJones as my #2 RB all year? Thanks in advance for your help... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr. b00m Posted September 22, 2004 Share Posted September 22, 2004 I just think it's absurd to claim its an embarassment, many teams will lose this year, that doesn't mean LSU is an embarassment to their conference, you people ... tsk tsk tsk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffeeman Posted September 22, 2004 Share Posted September 22, 2004 Hey UIG - what do the #s in your sigline mean? I think I know who 54 is, but the others...? And while we're here, since you're a CHI-town homer, will I be okay with TJones as my #2 RB all year? Thanks in advance for your help... 434620[/snapback] bumped to page 2... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.