Auburn 49 Oklahoma 13

[PatrickL]

Here is my new prediction in this mythical matchup! Couldn't stop Nebraska's running attack, couldn't stop A&M or OSU's passing attack. Auburn would drill them. On a side note.

 

USC 52 Oklahoma 20

 

here's hoping we don't have the sooners in the title game again. we saw what an embarrasment they were last time!

[Sgt. Ryan]

Here is my new prediction in this mythical matchup! Couldn't stop Nebraska's running attack, couldn't stop  A&M or OSU's passing attack. Auburn would drill them. On a side note.

 

USC 52 Oklahoma 20

 

here's hoping we don't have the sooners in the title game again. we saw what an embarrasment they were last time!

 

558559[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

Speaking of last yr, havent we already seen Auburn vs USC, in Auburn no doubt. Didnt USC already spanked them 23-0. Like we want to see that drilling again.

 

OU lost to LSU last yr 21-14, Auburn lost to LSU 31-7.

 

So if you want to speak of last yr, OU is twice as good as Auburn.

 

 

Here is your reality check. Miami 34- Auburn 13 in the Sugar Bowl.

 

OU - 35 - - USC 21

[GWPFFL BrianW]

We saw how good Oklahoma was against Kansas State last year. Florida beat LSU in Baton Rouge, Iowa stomped Florida in the Outback Bowl, using your theory, Iowa woulda killed Oklahoma.

[PatrickL]

i was just using your theory of last year. you all were quick to point to that au/usc game, a totally diff auburn team w/ a totally diff offense. don't worry we'll get the chance to see i feel!

[theeohiostate]

OU - 35 - - USC 21

 

558704[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

I'll give you 10 to 1 odds, on that spread and take USC for 5 K ? This time pay if you lose you WELCHER.

 

 

Any action?

[Monsters Of The Midway]

Oklahoma: 17

USC: 14

 

Would be 20-14 but, Trey DiCarlo will miss a 34 yard field goal.

[BIG A]

Oklahoma: 17

USC: 14

 

Would be 20-14 but, Trey DiCarlo will miss a 34 yard field goal.

 

559403[/snapback]

 

 

 

I like the total, but USC wins instead!

[theeohiostate]

Oklahoma: 17

USC: 14

 

Would be 20-14 but, Trey DiCarlo will miss a 34 yard field goal.

 

559403[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You can't be serious!

[Sgt. Ryan]

i was just using your theory of last year. you all were quick to point to that au/usc game, a totally diff auburn team w/ a totally diff offense. don't worry we'll get the chance to see i feel!

 

559110[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

How is Auburn better on offense than a yr ago. Campbell actually pulled his head out of his ass and doesnt make as many mistakes. Personally I dont think so, I think Campbell looks better this yr because the level of competition this yr is so much weaker. Auburn got out to a big lead vs Tenn, and Campbell didnt have to bring them back. Vs Ga, without Danny Ware, they had no chance as that offense isnt nearly the same without him. VS LSU the game was never put in Campbells hands to win. The final score was 10-9 and LSU loaded up to stop the run and Campbell made 1 play that beat them. Thats one more play than he made all of last yr. personally we dont know what Campbell or Auburn would do if they got behind by 14 or 21 pts. OU and USC have shown they are more than capable of dealing with that deficit and come roaring back to victory. If these 2 teams met, I seriously think OU would be up 28-7 mid 2nd Qtr, and would end up winning 49-13 because campbell would make a ton of mistakes trying to lead this team back and OU would cash in. I see no way Auburn could compete with OU. Besides, it isnt really going to matter. OU is going to be playing USC in Miami for the Championship and Auburn will be playing Miami In New Orleans for the Sugar Bowl.

[Coffeeman]

Oklahoma: 17

USC: 14

 

Would be 20-14 but, Trey DiCarlo will miss a 34 yard field goal.

 

559403[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

If that actually happens, its only because Killeen missed TWO FGs

[GWPFFL BrianW]

hey sarge stupid, how is it that Texas A & M and Okie State all of the sudden have better offenses than USC and Auburn? You're the dumbest, least knowledgable homer I've ever seen. And I remember a certain guy by the name of Carson Palmer, who sucked for 3 years and then his senior year did great. Jason Campbell has been great this year. Sarge, do you even watch these games? Seriously, to even suggest that A & M and Okie State are even in the same league as AU and USC, just proves how dumb you are. Get a life dude.

[Monsters Of The Midway]

hey sarge stupid, how is it that Texas A & M and Okie State all of the sudden have better offenses than USC and Auburn? You're the dumbest, least knowledgable homer I've ever seen. And I remember a certain guy by the name of Carson Palmer, who sucked for 3 years and then his senior year did great. Jason Campbell has been great this year. Sarge, do you even watch these games? Seriously, to even suggest that A & M and Okie State are even in the same league as AU and USC, just proves how dumb you are. Get a life dude.

 

560701[/snapback]

 

 

 

:bawling:

[Sgt. Ryan]

:bawling:

 

560738[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

really.

 

Where did I say Okie St and A@M had a better offense than USC or Auburn. Each game plays out differently. Texas has a better offense than Okie St or A@m, and OU shut them out. Each game is different. OU also gave up 14 pts on special teams on fakes and muffs both games. Ou has shored up its secondary, which I think would cause USC fits and Auburn may actually get shut out like Texas if they played OU. Their passing game isnt any better, and Texas has a better running game.

 

 

Jason campbell isnt Athena. Auburn played no one. No one. Who did they play that beat anyone. LSU, GA and Tenn are their only decent wins, and who did any of those 3 teams that beat any top 25 team but each other. Auburn beat up on the weak sisters of the SEC, and didnt even have a quality win as far as Im concerned. The SEC is rediculously weak this yr, and this is comign from someone who thinks highly of the conference but not this yr. This Auburn team would lose 31-7 to last yrs LSU team. It aint even close.

 

 

I also think USC is a solid opponent, but think outside Cal, they have had a gravey schedule. Va tech is proving to be a solid win early on. I do believe Texas would win either conference the SEC or pac-10 this yr.

Edited November 17, 2004 by Sgt. Ryan

[alexandernevermind]

OU - 35 - - USC 21

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dreams are good to have but the harsh reality is that OU would recieve an utter drubbing against USC --WITHOUT QUESTION !!!!!

 

 

Subtle differences:

1. Auburn has a new Offensive Coordinator that, while he knows he has stud RBs, doesn't feel the need to use them as the primary on EVERY play like last year. That decoy thing works good too.

2. Granted, that OU team had the advantage of the experience on the national stage but the questionable talent level was exposed when facing teams with equal prowess. This Auburn team has been exposed to that level of national scrutiny now and understands it's about what happens between the lines.

 

 

Talent-wise on both sides of the ball, USC vs Auburn would just be a better game

[Sgt. Ryan]

   

 

Dreams are good to have but the harsh reality is that OU would recieve an utter drubbing against USC --WITHOUT QUESTION !!!!!

Subtle differences:

1. Auburn has a new Offensive Coordinator that, while he knows he has stud RBs, doesn't feel the need to use them as the primary on EVERY play like last year.  That decoy thing works good too.

2. Granted, that OU team had the advantage of the experience on the national stage but the questionable talent level was exposed when facing teams with equal prowess.  This Auburn team has been exposed to that level of national scrutiny now and understands it's about what happens between the lines.

Talent-wise on both sides of the ball, USC vs Auburn would just be a better game

 

560847[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Your kidding, Talent wise you could put the best of USc and Auburn and OU is still superior. This is a joke of a post. Do you even recognize talent. White is a better college QB, OU has a better OL, Peterson is a better RB, the WR core is better than both teams combined. the DL Id take OU over either of them. The LBs, get real that is OUs trademark under Stoops. The secondary is the only flaw for the Sooners and that could be the only advantage Id give to either team. this Sooner team is better than the one that won the Championship in 2000.

 

 

If you watched OU vs texas, that would be OU vs Auburn. USC is leaps and bounds better than Auburn but would have a hard time keeping up with OU on the scoreboard and would eventually lose.

 

 

 

BTW, I agree with you on one thing. USC vs Auburn might be a better game. Because OU would rout em both. At least this game would be competitive.

Edited November 17, 2004 by Sgt. Ryan

[alexandernevermind]

Your kidding,  Talent wise you could put the best of USc and Auburn and OU is still superior.  This is a joke of a post. 

 

 

Well Sarge, I agree with your second sentence at least. I can see that you are a blind follower of the Sooner Nation, sans the questionable secondary caveat. But believe me, taking on the best of USC & Auburn is one game you and no one else in ALL of Oklahoma want to see .

 

Personally, I think OU has a lock on the #2 spot until after the championship game where they will take their rightful place behind USC, Auburn, & Cal. Provided of course that they can get past that perennial football powerhouse Baylor and continued on their course into the post-season.

Edited November 17, 2004 by alexandernevermind

[Monsters Of The Midway]

But believe me, taking on the best of USC & Auburn is one game you and no one else in ALL of Oklahoma want to see .

 

560923[/snapback]

 

 

 

I wanna see it. Shows you how much you know.

[alexandernevermind]

I wanna see it.  Shows you how much you know.

 

560931[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

Truly do wish I and the BCS could make that happen 4 U. It really would squash the tomfoolery, and with emphasis no less.

[Sgt. Ryan]

Truly do wish I and the BCS could make that happen 4 U.  It really would squash the tomfoolery, and with emphasis no less. 

 

560974[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

This isnt homerism. I think OU is head and shoulders better than USC or Auburn and would handily beat either team in the Championship. You have no idea the talent on that team this yr. From afar you look at those 2 road wins and you think they skated by. Hardly, They played as poorly as they could with their best CB out of the game and still won on the road in hostile environments.

 

This yr, its on, and USC better be ready. The USC fans ought to get prepared to, because its going to be painful. I just want to set the record straight, OU is going to pummell USC, and they will leave no doubt as they did in 2000 when they shut out Fla St.

Edited November 18, 2004 by Sgt. Ryan

[GWPFFL BrianW]

sarge, it's homerism. It's ok, this everyone has a right to be stupid. You're no exception. It'll just be funnier to throw all of your stupidity in your face, when Oklahoma loses to either Auburn or USC. Like I said before, the worst thing that could happen WOULD be that Oklahoma got screwed, cuz then they'd go beat Utah in a landslide, and sarge stupid would be in here acting like it actually means something.

 

Who the he|| has Texas beat??! They struggle with sh|tty teams like Kasnas, and all hte sudden they can win the SEC. Yeah I'm sure sarge. Maybe Texas will head to the Cotton Bowl, and get matched up against one of those "weak" SEC schools, and then get taken to the woodshed. Sorry Sooner fans, i fail to see, other than Adrian Peterson, why OU is any different than last year. They've played a overrated schedule, and barely won against overrated teams. The only reason they are still ahead of Auburn, is because they had the luxury of starting off that high. You play a soft schedule, and you get the luxury of remaining that high. There best win is Texas, and Texas isn't impressive. Sorry, but they just aren't. No one in any conference is threatened by them. They have no passing game, and an overrated defense. Texas A & M isn't even an issue, they lost to Baylor. Oklahoma State is overrated, and has no defense. So who has Oklahoma beat? The answer, really, is not a *** soul.

 

I do agree, with you, USC is getting pass, but they are the defending national champs. My personal opinion, is if you are the defending national champs, and you start off undefeated like they have, you should be #1. I was saying the same thing about Oklahoma in 2001, before they lost to Nebraska. USC should, unfair or not, get a chance to defend there title, and if they win out, they'll get that chance. Either Oklahoma or Auburn will get screwed, and it'll likely be Auburn. Then USC will light up Oklahoma, and the OU fans will go on with their usual excuses of "well 9 times out of 10 OU woulda won".

[Sgt. Ryan]

sarge, it's homerism. It's ok, this everyone has a right to be stupid. You're no exception. It'll just be funnier to throw all of your stupidity in your face, when Oklahoma loses to either Auburn or USC. Like I said before, the worst thing that could happen WOULD be that Oklahoma got screwed, cuz then they'd go beat Utah in a landslide, and sarge stupid would be in here acting like it actually means something.

 

Who the he|| has Texas beat??! They struggle with sh|tty teams like Kasnas, and all hte sudden they can win the SEC. Yeah I'm sure sarge. Maybe Texas will head to the Cotton Bowl, and get matched up against one of those "weak" SEC schools, and then get taken to the woodshed. Sorry Sooner fans, i fail to see, other than Adrian Peterson, why OU is any different than last year. They've played a overrated schedule, and barely won against overrated teams. The only reason they are still ahead of Auburn, is because they had the luxury of starting off that high. You play a soft schedule, and you get the luxury of remaining that high. There best win is Texas, and Texas isn't impressive. Sorry, but they just aren't. No one in any conference is threatened by them. They have no passing game, and an overrated defense. Texas A & M isn't even an issue, they lost to Baylor. Oklahoma State is overrated, and has no defense. So who has Oklahoma beat? The answer, really, is not a *** soul.

 

I do agree, with you, USC is getting pass, but they are the defending national champs. My personal opinion, is if you are the defending national champs, and you start off undefeated like they have, you should be #1. I was saying the same thing about Oklahoma in 2001, before they lost to Nebraska. USC should, unfair or not, get a chance to defend there title, and if they win out, they'll get that chance. Either Oklahoma or Auburn will get screwed, and it'll likely be Auburn. Then USC will light up Oklahoma, and the OU fans will go on with their usual excuses of "well 9 times out of 10 OU woulda won".

 

561403[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

Your opinion is noted. But I disagree 100%. The offense in the Big 12 especially from the best 3 teams in the conference are head and shoulders ahead of any in the SEC, and Texas biatch slapped LSU the last time they played them in the Cotton Bowl. OU will beat USC, and this endless drivel by haters will be put to rest. Auburn hasnt beaten anyone, and played the weakest non confernce schedule of any team in the top 25. That alone plus victories over Kentucky, Arkansas, Miss and Miss St sure are impressive. USC didnt win a title last yr, they were given a piece of LSUs. If Michigan had beaten USC would LSU of shared its title with them, no. So USC didnt play for the title, they were handed a piece of it.

[GWPFFL BrianW]

USC won the national title last year. So did LSU. That's over with and done. Auburn played a weak non conference schedule, but OU's was just as weak. Bowling Green isn't that good, and Oregon sucks too.

 

The SEC plays that thing called defense. The Big 12 doesn't. It'll get proven in the bowls. OU will lose, and like I said, you'll be making excuses like you always do. There is ample evidence to support that, not only this year, but last year as well. All people have to do, is go back a year, and see that you were saying the same garbage last year, and what happened? OU got spanked by Kansas State, and then dominated by LSU. Don't give me this, look at the scoreboard crap, everyone knows, that LSU dominated OU in that game. From the opening gun to the final gun, LSU was in control of the game. The only reason they didn't blow you out was because LSU had an average offense. KSU had a good offense, LSU didn't. Result was the same, just the scoreboard looked a bit different. Either way it was 2 decisive wins over Chokelahoma, and fans like you want to convince all of us that it didn't happen. All I've seen, is the same *** team being thrown onto the field from the Sooners, dominating a what will prove to be a weak conference. Just wait. It'll happen. Don't worry. What will the excuse be sarge? Have you decided yet?

[theeohiostate]

Speaking of last yr, havent we already seen Auburn vs USC, in Auburn no doubt.  Didnt USC already spanked them 23-0.  Like we want to see that drilling again.

 

OU lost to LSU last yr 21-14, Auburn lost to LSU 31-7. 

 

So if you want to speak of last yr, OU is twice as good as Auburn.

Here is your reality check.  Miami 34- Auburn 13 in the Sugar Bowl.

 

OU - 35 - - USC 21

 

558704[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

 

Those predictions show one thing: you've got balls - big ones. They may be Stoops, and bouncing off your chin, but you've still got them.

 

Edited November 19, 2004 by theeohiostate