Duchess Jack Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 ((my missing 'e' from above)) I am a rabid Dolphins fan and would gladly get rid of Madison and Surtain, but would like to see JT and Zach retire as Dolphins. Oh yeah...if anybody wants him, they can have Ricky as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yukon Cornelius Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 moss but not unless they get alot in return... and i dont think they can or will Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duchess Jack Posted February 8, 2005 Author Share Posted February 8, 2005 I also don't want to part with Chambers or McMichael... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selly Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 Trade Arrington for 2 decent O-Linemen... They can take Gardner as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vet Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 It's probably easier for me to list the Jets I would NOT trade - everyone else is fair game as far as I'm concerned: Jonathan Vilma Dwayne Robertson Shaun Ellis Kevin Mawae Chad Pennington Curtis Martin I'd like to see them get someting for John Abraham if they could. I like the guy and I'm not one of those fans who's ticked off at him for not playing in the two playoff games, but I think Bryan Thomas is a very servicable replacement and comes with a much lower price tag. So, if they could get a WR who's a legitimate threat, I'd trade Abraham in a heartbeat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatman Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 Packers: Cletidus Hunt, KGB, Hannibal Navies, Ahmad Carroll, Al Harris, Mark Roman...basically anyone on the Packer's D not named Kampman, Jackson, Barnett, Sharper, and Diggs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patsfan04 Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 For the Pats, I would want to trade Ty Law. If they can't trade him, they will probably cut him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duchess Jack Posted February 8, 2005 Author Share Posted February 8, 2005 Trade Arrington for 2 decent O-Linemen... They can take Gardner as well. 689632[/snapback] We had him - and don't want him back. That guy is an 'a' hole. An amazing d-lineman when he is not hurt, but his BS is not worth his healthy two weeks a year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down Goes Frazia Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 michael bennett or onterrio smith....... or mewelde moore for that matter. the vikes don't need all 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 (edited) Bears: take anyone. OK maybe stick with Urlacher. And Harris. And OK, when healthy, the secondary is decent (but not untouchable, trade-wise). Anyone else, take 'em (cough, Grossman). Chargers: Do not touch LT, Gates, Brees (screw Rivers). I'd like Neal to stay. I think Jammer's best years are ahead of him. Keep him. Edwards, for sure. Keep him. Everyone else is fair game. Edited February 8, 2005 by darin3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeductiveNun Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 michael bennett or onterrio smith....... or mewelde moore for that matter. the vikes don't need all 3. 689656[/snapback] I second that motion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vet Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 michael bennett or onterrio smith....... or mewelde moore for that matter. the vikes don't need all 3. 689656[/snapback] If he can stay clean, I think Onterrio is the best of the bunch. Is that the opinion among Viking fans? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Pimp Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 So, if they could get a WR who's a legitimate threat, I'd trade Abraham in a heartbeat. 689643[/snapback] A legitimate deep WR or a possesion guy? No need for a deep threat WR when CP can't throw the deep ball very effectively. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vet Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 A legitimate deep WR or a possesion guy? No need for a deep threat WR when CP can't throw the deep ball very effectively. 689722[/snapback] I think McCareins is good enough to be a very effective posession reciever, so they need a deep threat. If Chad can't throw the ball deep, this franchise is in serious trouble for the next seven years. I'm hoping his rotator cuff surgery is successful and that is the answer to the problem he clearly had the last few weeks of the season. Actually after considering it further, I think Santana Moss can be enough of a deep threat if he can stay healthy. What they really need is a tight end who is a serious recieving threat. What's Antonio Gates' contract situation? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pigskin Junkie Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 Plaxico Burress..... I went back and watched the AFC Championship game... It does not help being tall if you don't know how to jump. The midget covering him kept jumping up and swating down those balls. And then Burress has the nads to come out and say he is not involved enough... Pittsburgh needs a tall, fast receiver, but we need one that can make the catches they are paid to catch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeductiveNun Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 If he can stay clean, I think Onterrio is the best of the bunch. Is that the opinion among Viking fans? 689719[/snapback] It is for this one. I sure wouldn't shed a tear to see Bennett traded away. If we can get $50, a bottle of Boones Farm, and a hooker for him, I think we'd be doing well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phenom Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 Raiders you can have Wheatley, Kerry Collins, Teyo Johnson, Justin Fargas, Warren Sapp and Ted Washington. If we can get anything for these guys I'll be happy............ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chargerz Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 Chargers: Do not touch LT, Gates, Brees (screw Rivers). I'd like Neal to stay. I think Jammer's best years are ahead of him. Keep him. Edwards, for sure. Keep him. Everyone else is fair game. 689683[/snapback] Yeah, especially Tim Dwight!! Nice guy, but trade him already!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skins Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 Trade Arrington for 2 decent O-Linemen... They can take Gardner as well. 689632[/snapback] We had him - and don't want him back. That guy is an 'a' hole. An amazing d-lineman when he is not hurt, but his BS is not worth his healthy two weeks a year. 689650[/snapback] DJ, Selly is talking about Rod Gardner not Daryl Gardner. The redskins releases D Gardner a couple seasons ago and he went ot Denver where he and Shanahan got inot it, he got hurt and I think there may be some sort of litigation going on now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 NEVER TRADE: Hines Ward, Ben Roethlisberger, Hines Ward, Alan Faneca, Aaron Smith, James Farrior, Troy Polamalu, Casey Hampton TRADE: Plaxico Burress, Kendrell Bell (Both are free agents, but if they stay) Jeff Hartings (Great player, but up in age and Okobi could fill in well, but don't read into it, only due to age, I love Hartings) Chad Scott (If you could get anything for hm at this point in his career) Kimo Von Oelhoffen (Solid, but getting up in age) Joey Porter (Phenomenal OLB, but he would bring in good value and I think James Harrison could fill the void nicely) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoog Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 Since it is the BEST player I would trade, Bye bye Drew Brees. By low, Sell HIGH! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Dick Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 I wouldn't mind seeing the Chiefs trade Priest or Gonzalez at this point to get some immediate defensive help. For the Priest situation, he goes to a team that is an RB away from a deep playoff run. With Larry Johnson emerging, and with that offensive line, I'd feel comfortable going into next season with Johnson. As for Gonzalez, the Chiefs drafted Kris Wilson for a reason. I believe he will fill SOME of the holes of Gonzalez. Obviously time will tell what his real value is, but losing Gonzo to obtain some defensive help would be ok with me. As for who is out there, I don't know. I haven't had time to analyze the best combinations. Chiefs needs are linebackers and secondary help, specifically a middle linebacker and a good shut down corner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donutrun Jellies Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 Plaxico Burress..... I went back and watched the AFC Championship game... It does not help being tall if you don't know how to jump. The midget covering him kept jumping up and swating down those balls. And then Burress has the nads to come out and say he is not involved enough... Pittsburgh needs a tall, fast receiver, but we need one that can make the catches they are paid to catch 689766[/snapback] Agreed. Let plax go, get a tall fast wr with the 2nd round pick this year ... or change directions a bit and sign Hoosyerdaddy from Cincy if he's affordable ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duchess Jack Posted February 9, 2005 Author Share Posted February 9, 2005 DJ, Selly is talking about Rod Gardner not Daryl Gardner. The redskins releases D Gardner a couple seasons ago and he went ot Denver where he and Shanahan got inot it, he got hurt and I think there may be some sort of litigation going on now. 689914[/snapback] ooooohhh, yeah. I remember now. Hmph, go figure - Gardner goes to Denver and here I remain, *** in hand and skins friend's sister's kitchen on fire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Trick Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 I wouldn't mind seeing the Chiefs trade Priest or Gonzalez at this point to get some immediate defensive help. For the Priest situation, he goes to a team that is an RB away from a deep playoff run. With Larry Johnson emerging, and with that offensive line, I'd feel comfortable going into next season with Johnson. As for Gonzalez, the Chiefs drafted Kris Wilson for a reason. I believe he will fill SOME of the holes of Gonzalez. Obviously time will tell what his real value is, but losing Gonzo to obtain some defensive help would be ok with me. As for who is out there, I don't know. I haven't had time to analyze the best combinations. Chiefs needs are linebackers and secondary help, specifically a middle linebacker and a good shut down corner. 689930[/snapback] okay, I'll agree with your last statement 100%, but I don't agree with trading the best TE in the game. They drafted Wilson essentially to create matchup problems for the defense for both Gonzo and him and I think it would have worked to perfection had he not broke his leg. I want gonzo to stay a Chief for life! I'm skeptical about trading Priest, but could go along with it for one of if not the best MLB in the NFL, otherwise I balk at any of that noise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.