gspot Posted April 7, 2005 Share Posted April 7, 2005 Don't know if this is old news already, but didn't see any previous posts. On NFL Network this morning, Adam Schefter reported Chiefs and Raiders are working on a deal that would send Woodson to KC before draft day. They mentioned how rare it is for division rivals to consummate a trade, but according to them, its very likely it will happen! If so, I for one think it would be a great deal for KC. Woodson is still young and would be a big boost to their defense. Just an FYI.... Sorry for the lack of video. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin Johnies Posted April 7, 2005 Share Posted April 7, 2005 What would the Raiders get? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duchess Jack Posted April 7, 2005 Share Posted April 7, 2005 GARBAGE!!!!! Man, I love Surtain and all, but.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muck Posted April 7, 2005 Share Posted April 7, 2005 GARBAGE!!!!! Man, I love Surtain and all, but.... 768869[/snapback] Garbage = bad deal for KC? ... bad deal for MIA (b/c KC won't be as inclined to give them a pick for Surtain now)? ... bad deal for OAK? ??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muck Posted April 7, 2005 Share Posted April 7, 2005 PS - I'd still rather have Surtain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duchess Jack Posted April 7, 2005 Share Posted April 7, 2005 I was really hoping to deal Surtain to KC....looks like this is not too likely now.....next stop, Seattle? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duchess Jack Posted April 7, 2005 Share Posted April 7, 2005 Could it just be 'agent misinformation' to make Miami take a pick that they don't want in exchange for Pat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NAUgrad Posted April 7, 2005 Share Posted April 7, 2005 Wow. Hadn't heard that. I guess Oakland is really trying to eliminate every decent player from their defense. This is getting interesting. The AFC West is starting to look better all the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phenom Posted April 7, 2005 Share Posted April 7, 2005 Wow. Hadn't heard that. I guess Oakland is really trying to eliminate every decent player from their defense. This is getting interesting. The AFC West is starting to look better all the time. 768961[/snapback] Yeah some other team has already locked up the rebuild the defense with the Cleveland Browns leftovers option.......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NAUgrad Posted April 7, 2005 Share Posted April 7, 2005 Yeah some other team has already locked up the rebuild the defense with the Cleveland Browns leftovers option.......... 769058[/snapback] Ouch!! That one hurt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatman Posted April 7, 2005 Share Posted April 7, 2005 Wow. Hadn't heard that. I guess Oakland is really trying to eliminate every decent player from their defense. This is getting interesting. The AFC West is starting to look better all the time. 768961[/snapback] Man, Charles Woodson is overpriced and overrated. This would be huge for the Raiders to free up cap room and to rid themselves of a perenial underachiever. If I were a Raiders fan I'd be really happy about this. Woodson's cap number relation to his ability is insane. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swampnuts Posted April 7, 2005 Share Posted April 7, 2005 Man, Charles Woodson is overpriced and overrated. This would be huge for the Raiders to free up cap room and to rid themselves of a perenial underachiever. If I were a Raiders fan I'd be really happy about this. Woodson's cap number relation to his ability is insane. 769535[/snapback] Right on target Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muck Posted April 7, 2005 Share Posted April 7, 2005 Right on target 769594[/snapback] Which is why I'm not surprised that Carl Peterson is somehow involved in this... This smells like a bad idea... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XFlash Posted April 7, 2005 Share Posted April 7, 2005 Man, Charles Woodson is overpriced and overrated. This would be huge for the Raiders to free up cap room and to rid themselves of a perenial underachiever. If I were a Raiders fan I'd be really happy about this. Woodson's cap number relation to his ability is insane. 769535[/snapback] Agree. I would not mind keep Woodson, but not at his current Franchsie tag price Oakland could use some extra picks to improve the defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gspot Posted April 8, 2005 Author Share Posted April 8, 2005 Man, Charles Woodson is overpriced and overrated. This would be huge for the Raiders to free up cap room and to rid themselves of a perenial underachiever. If I were a Raiders fan I'd be really happy about this. Woodson's cap number relation to his ability is insane. 769535[/snapback] This is true. I didn't consider that when evaluating the trade, but his cap number is over-inflated. Considering the dollars involved, Surtain may be a better move. Lets see what they have to say about it, if anything tomorrow. They need someone to cover Randy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kraftykraft Posted April 8, 2005 Share Posted April 8, 2005 As a Raider fan, I have to say that Charles Woodson is the Randy Moss of cornerbacks--well, maybe not that good. He takes too many plays/games off, in between his highlights. He is capable of being terrific, but he loses focus too much and gets outhustled a lot. All-in-all, I would rate him as an overall better-than-average CB, who could be a hall-of-fame lock if he ever wakes up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Vatican Hitsquad Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Man, Charles Woodson is overpriced and overrated. This would be huge for the Raiders to free up cap room and to rid themselves of a perenial underachiever. If I were a Raiders fan I'd be really happy about this. Woodson's cap number relation to his ability is insane. 769535[/snapback] Dead on, if fit your description to a "T". The man is a locker room cancer who get's burnt as often as he gets hurt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.