Jackass Posted April 21, 2005 Share Posted April 21, 2005 Obviously, a bit of a crapshoot, but just curious of everyone's opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meat Face Posted April 21, 2005 Share Posted April 21, 2005 Knowing what we know now, the obvious choice is Ben. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted April 21, 2005 Share Posted April 21, 2005 Knowing what we know now, the obvious choice is Ben. 788698[/snapback] I don't know that I agree with that. There will be no obvious choice for a few years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin Johnies Posted April 21, 2005 Share Posted April 21, 2005 Knowing what we know now, the obvious choice is Ben. 788698[/snapback] wurd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchoutofwater Posted April 21, 2005 Share Posted April 21, 2005 I thought Ben was the best choice last year, and laughed when the Giants gave away so much Eli. Last year I would have ranked the QB's Roth #1, Manning #2, and Rivers #3. I think all three of them are better than anyone coming out this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted April 21, 2005 Share Posted April 21, 2005 Ben being able to make something out of a broken down play, got my attention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted April 21, 2005 Share Posted April 21, 2005 Manning. Pedigree, improving supporting cast. Higher ceiling than Roethlisberger. Big Ben's certainly a good choice, too... but Manning potentially could produce much bigger numbers, given the offensive styles of Manning/Big Ben, respectively. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NAUgrad Posted April 21, 2005 Share Posted April 21, 2005 Manning. Pedigree, improving supporting cast. Higher ceiling than Roethlisberger. Big Ben's certainly a good choice, too... but Manning potentially could produce much bigger numbers, given the offensive styles of Manning/Big Ben, respectively. 788727[/snapback] Pedigree does not make Eli a good QB. More than not, someone's brother ends up being no where near as good. I haven't been that impressed with Eli. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimD Posted April 21, 2005 Share Posted April 21, 2005 sometimes I really don't care. And this is one of those times. But if I had to care, Big Ben is my choice. He is a head above the rest. Literally he really is. I also heard he is down with NWA. So am I. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted April 21, 2005 Share Posted April 21, 2005 Pedigree does not make Eli a good QB. More than not, someone's brother ends up being no where near as good. I haven't been that impressed with Eli. 788736[/snapback] I haven't been all too impressed with him either. Believe me, I have ripped him pretty good in past threads. And sure, that's your opinion that pedigree means nothing. I'm sure others agree and others disagree. As much as I've been unimpressed with him, he did show flashes, and improved to an extent towards the end of the season. Roethlisberger, on the other hand, looked shaky towards the end of the season and during the playoffs. His supporting cast - and defense - are MUCH better than Manning's. Yeah, Roethlisberger was impressive - especially for a rookie, wow - but ... and I think this was discussed in a thread last season ... I bet ya dollars to donuts Manning would have been just as successful playing for the Steelers... my opinion, of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_hause101_ Posted April 21, 2005 Share Posted April 21, 2005 What about Losman? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.