Pigskin Junkie Posted April 27, 2005 Share Posted April 27, 2005 I love it! Chad will definitely help this team crumble... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patsfan04 Posted April 29, 2005 Share Posted April 29, 2005 (edited) The difference is: 1. Scott will not be the highest player on the Patriots 2. If he isn't producing, he won't play or will be cut. 2004 Pittsburgh Steelers Player.........................Base Salary......Total Salary...Cap Value.....Position Scott, Chad .................$3,885,000.......$4,085,000....$4,985,000....CB Smith, Aaron...............$3,150,000.......$3,553,600....$4,514,266....DE Faneca, Alan................$2,525,000.......$3,751,600....$4,374,350....OL Hartings, Jeff...............$2,550,000.......$3,750,000....$4,211,665....OL Von Oelhoffen, Kimo......$760,000........$1,801,600....$2,406,600....DE Farrior, James...............$660,000........$5,438,200....$2,404,868....LB Ward, Hines..................$1,668,750.....$1,671,950....$2,171,950....WR Edited April 29, 2005 by Patsfan04 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squeegiebo Posted April 29, 2005 Share Posted April 29, 2005 Have fun with that tard, Pats fans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncosn05 Posted April 30, 2005 Share Posted April 30, 2005 Couldn't happe to a better team. What a cocky f uck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msaint Posted April 30, 2005 Share Posted April 30, 2005 Wow. You guys are grasping at your Pats-hating straws earlier than ever this year! Seems to me that Bengals fans were saying the same thing about a tard named Dillon last year and his effect on the Pats chemistry. Like it or not, the Pats have a system that's working, and a player can either buy in and stay, or try to rock the boat and be spat out like a bad piece of gristle. Scott (and Terrell, for that matter) no doubt know this, and will toe the line. I realize you're happy to be rid of a relative financial drain on your team, one who stayed "cocky" despite lack of production, but the guy was solid before he got hurt (2000-2001 he was quite good, if memory serves), and was just unable to win his job back from Williams, no? Good signing, I think. If he can stay healthy, he'll be well worth it...and last year proved we need depth at CB (see Brown, Troy...might Aaron Glenn be next? Parcells might not let that happen, but...). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncosn05 Posted April 30, 2005 Share Posted April 30, 2005 Wow. You guys are grasping at your Pats-hating straws earlier than ever this year! 799128[/snapback] He11 yeah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Last Plane Out Posted April 30, 2005 Share Posted April 30, 2005 he will probably attend the same charm school as Dillon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pigskin Junkie Posted May 1, 2005 Author Share Posted May 1, 2005 Sorry.... what can I say... I hate the Pats AND Chad Scott has really pissed me off the last few years! Wow. You guys are grasping at your Pats-hating straws earlier than ever this year! Seems to me that Bengals fans were saying the same thing about a tard named Dillon last year and his effect on the Pats chemistry. Like it or not, the Pats have a system that's working, and a player can either buy in and stay, or try to rock the boat and be spat out like a bad piece of gristle. Scott (and Terrell, for that matter) no doubt know this, and will toe the line. I realize you're happy to be rid of a relative financial drain on your team, one who stayed "cocky" despite lack of production, but the guy was solid before he got hurt (2000-2001 he was quite good, if memory serves), and was just unable to win his job back from Williams, no? Good signing, I think. If he can stay healthy, he'll be well worth it...and last year proved we need depth at CB (see Brown, Troy...might Aaron Glenn be next? Parcells might not let that happen, but...). 799128[/snapback] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 Seems to me that Bengals fans were saying the same thing about a tard named Dillon last year and his effect on the Pats chemistry.799128[/snapback] yeah, except dillon can actually play Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 I think that Chad Scott is worthless as a CB. I think he could have some value as a Safety. However, nothing would surprise me with this team. They got some value out of Hank Poteat last year, which amazed me, so who knows what they can do with Chad Scott. I am glad he is not a Steeler anymore, but nothing from the Patriots would shock me at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.