Beaumont Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 Link Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muck Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 Can't be much of a ringing endorsement of Rashaun Woods, I'd think... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
major-tom Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 That just goes to show what kind of shape the Niners are in and how bad their WRs are. Maybe Morton can show the youngsters a thing or two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pancake Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 (edited) That just goes to show what kind of shape the Niners are in and how bad their WRs are. Maybe Morton can show the youngsters a thing or two. 849492[/snapback]     Yep. I've been trying to tell eveybody this for months now. Rookie QB with a couple of trash heap WRs. Expect worse numbers from Barlow this year as compared to last. The Defense is respectible (like last year) but they will wear down by the late 3rd quarter cause they will be on the feild 75% of the time and then the opposing offense will put up big numbers. Ohhhh the pain.....what happened to the 9ers? Edited June 21, 2005 by Pancake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beaumont Posted June 21, 2005 Author Share Posted June 21, 2005 Historically in SF as I understand it, the feature position for Rice, TO, etc. has been flanker. SF has run Battle at No. 1 at flanker and Lloyd at No. 1 at split end at mini camps. The statements have been that Battle was the most impressive at mini-camps thus far. Â Interesting to see how this effects the Lloyd/Battle values (deeper leagues and dynasty leagues only) ... Morton has traditionally been a split end (Lloyd's position) -- but he played some flanker in KC (albeit with poor results such that they moved him back to split end) ... Â Is he the third WR to replace Hamilton with Woods on the trash pile? The first or second WR over Battle or Lloyd? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beaumont Posted June 22, 2005 Author Share Posted June 22, 2005 Historically in SF as I understand it, the feature position for Rice, TO, etc. has been flanker. SF has run Battle at No. 1 at flanker and Lloyd at No. 1 at split end at mini camps. The statements have been that Battle was the most impressive at mini-camps thus far. Interesting to see how this effects the Lloyd/Battle values (deeper leagues and dynasty leagues only) ... Morton has traditionally been a split end (Lloyd's position) -- but he played some flanker in KC (albeit with poor results such that they moved him back to split end) ...  Is he the third WR to replace Hamilton with Woods on the trash pile? The first or second WR over Battle or Lloyd?  849524[/snapback]     49ers Official Depth Chart has him backing up Lloyd at the split end position.  49ers Depth Chart Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piranha Posted June 22, 2005 Share Posted June 22, 2005 49ers should get another top 5 pick in next years draft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexgaddis Posted June 22, 2005 Share Posted June 22, 2005 : Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchoutofwater Posted June 22, 2005 Share Posted June 22, 2005 Wouldn't you know this would happen right after I draft Arnez Battle late in a dynasty league to put on the DTS. darn my luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yo mama Posted June 22, 2005 Share Posted June 22, 2005 My poor, poor Niners. Oh, the humanity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmoore Posted June 22, 2005 Share Posted June 22, 2005 :Â 850106[/snapback] Â Â Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoJoTheWebToedBoy Posted June 22, 2005 Share Posted June 22, 2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncosn05 Posted June 23, 2005 Share Posted June 23, 2005 :Â 850106[/snapback] Â Â Â Beat me to it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shotgun Messiahs Posted June 23, 2005 Share Posted June 23, 2005 Where's Alex Smith on the Depth Chart? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'canes2004 Posted June 23, 2005 Share Posted June 23, 2005 Where's Alex Smith on the Depth Chart? 851304[/snapback]     Probably hiding in a bunker somewhere in Utah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pancake Posted June 23, 2005 Share Posted June 23, 2005 Where's Alex Smith on the Depth Chart? 851304[/snapback]     Without actually looking at the depth chart I can confidently tell you he will start every game if he is healthy. Why you ask? Its simple. The 9ers have no chance of winning more than 2 games with or with out Alex in the line up so they have nothing to lose by playing him and giving him exposure to the game. Call it rebuilding....seems like they been rebuilding since Mooch left. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchoutofwater Posted June 23, 2005 Share Posted June 23, 2005 seems like they been rebuilding since Mooch left. 851686[/snapback] They have been rebuilding ever since that wench took over for her brother. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pancake Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 Hmmmm. Alex Smith is not even on the 49er depth chart on their website . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.