Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

consensus rankings


Avernus
 Share

Recommended Posts

I guess I'll do it...I forget what he used to do, though :D

 

edit: isn't it usually performance scoring and then just start listing away?...I recall him doing something extra with alot of wording...wording that I don't recall what-so-ever

Edited by Avernus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Skippy's 2004 announcement post.

 

This will be the sixth annual Huddle Members Consensus Cheat Sheet. If you are going to skip the long post, (I suggest that for those that have done a few of the CCS’s over the years), then just a thumbs up to let me know that you are willing to help build this years version will suffice. Then get ready to start your votes on Monday.

 

Now for the rest of you.

 

I’m sure that most of you have a good idea how this works but just incase you have been under a rock for the past six years, here’s a quick explanation.

 

We are going to create a “redraft cheat sheet” to help with your early rankings. The list is a single list with QB’s, RB’s and WR’s all ranked together starting with your number one overall pick and working our way down the list until interest fades. In the past there has always been debate about adding TE’s to the list but for this list we are acting as though the league in question is not a TE required league. Any vote for a TE would be because at that point you think he is better than any WR that is available.

 

In the past I tried to leave votes open all day so that people who can only log on during certain times of the day always had a chance to vote. This year I think that for the first twenty or so picks we will move a little quicker and once there is a clear cut winner we will lockup and open a new thread.

 

As always all votes are welcome even the unpopular ones. Those of you that have helped build the list in the past know that even if I start voting for James Stewart with the first overall pick, it is not going to skew the results unless the majority of us had a sudden brain cramp.

 

As for voting on players with uncertain current conditions: vote based on what your current knowledge is as if this was your actual draft right now.

 

Scoring to consider when making your picks will be performance based and the same for all position players. However, if you really need to see it to crunch some numbers, then here is the scoring that the CCS is built around:

 

QB, RB, WR/TE

Number of Passing TDs: Every 1 TDs = 4 Pts

Passing Yardage: Every 25 Yds = 1 Pts

Pass Interception (thrown): Every 1 Qty = -2 Pts

Number of Rushing TDs: Every 1 TDs = 6 Pts

Rushing Yardage: Every 10 Yds = 1 Pts

Number of Receiving TDs: Every 1 TDs = 6 Pts

Receiving Yardage: Every 10 Yds = 1 Pts

2 Pt Conversion (Pass): Every 1 Qty = 2 Pts

2 Pt Conversion (Rush): Every 1 Qty = 2 Pts

2 Pt Conversion (Receive): Every 1 Qty = 2 Pts

 

------------

Kicker

Number of Field Goals Made: Every 1 Qty = 3 Pts

Field Goal Distance: Yds Pts

40 = +1

50 = +2

Make an Extra Point: Every 1 Qty = 1 Pts

 

------------

Defense

Points Against: Qty Pts

0 = 10

1 = 9 - it can't happen.

2 = 8

3 = 7

4 = 6

5 = 5

6 = 4

7 = 3

8 = 2

9 = 1

10 = 0

Total Yards Against: Yds Pts

0 = 5

200 = 3

250 = 1

300 = 0

Sack (by Defense): Every 1.00 Qty = 1 Pts

Safety: Every 1 Qty = 2 Pts

Number of Blocked FGs: Every 1 Qty = 2 Pts

Number of Blocked Punts: Every 1 Qty = 2 Pts

Number of Blocked XPs: Every 1 Qty = 2 Pts

Number of Intercept Return TDsEvery 1 TDs = 6 Pts

Interception (Return): Every 1 Qty = 2 Pts

Fumble Recovery: Every 1 Qty = 2 Pts

Number of Fumble Recovery TDs:Every 1 TDs = 2 Pts

Number of Kickoff Return TDs: Every 1 TDs = 6 Pts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if there would be support for making the CCS such that TEs are considered a seperate starting position from WRs?  Don't most leagues distinguish between TE and WR? :D

 

885527[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

yea, but the actual value should be the same....I'm keeping it simple because most of the TE's that you value highly would probably go in the same spot as if we made them seperate..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if there would be support for making the CCS such that TEs are considered a seperate starting position from WRs?  Don't most leagues distinguish between TE and WR? :D

 

885527[/snapback]

 

 

 

I'm pretty sure Blitz could come in and give his opinion on the subject.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information