Well, Faulk has played at least 14 games in every season but one since 1997, and his reduced workload should help him stay healthy this year. So, Faulk will probably get dinged up, but he'll likely see the field in 14 games yet again.
No contradiction when I point out Faulk's recieving totals, as he was the best recieving RB ever to play this game. I still think, as I said earlier, that in clear passing situations Faulk will see the field ahead of Jackson, while in clear running situations Jackson will play. Both Faulk and Jackson could catch 40 passes this year, but a 190 rush 40 catch running back will never be elite, sorry.
I agree that Jackson is a huge talent, and if Faulk was gone I would have him as a top 5 back. As it is though, he struggles to make the top 20 in my rankings (he is currently 19) and I could understand if some people had him out of the top 20. Clearly in keeper and dynasty leagues, you have to draft him very early, but in redraft leagues he is a below-average starting back, IMO.