conehead116

Any and all opinions appreciated.

Since it is not stipulated, I assume we all have until 1pm PST.

Anybody else have thoughts?

Which 3 out of these 4 do I start? Santonio Holmes (home vs. CIN) Kevin Walter (@ CLE) Antonio Bryant (@ DET) Mark Bradley (home vs. BUF) The only sure starter is A. Bryant.

The league never mentioned intent because they cannot prove intent. The minute they mention the word intent it gives legal grounds for Wilfork to pursue action against the league through the players union. By not claiming he had intent to injure they avoided this, but still implied it by levying the fine.

In the updated player projections D. Huard is still listed as the quarterback for KC even though T. Green has been named the official starter. Is this just an oversite?

Fair enough

Surprising that nobody has mentioned that this is a fantasy football forum and this has absolutely nothing to do with fantasy football.

After reading this entire thread and acting as an unbiased observer, I offer a judgement to your initial question, "Can this stop now?". Simply put, not until more data is aquired. You have not presented enough evidence to overule any further discussion of the comparison of Rothlesberger to Dilfer. Bronco Billy has presented compelling arguements to support the comparison. Your only response to him has been that the numbers support your case, but the general consensis is that this, at this point, is not true. I appreciate your dedication to your QB, but the comparison is still valid at this point. What the future holds we shall all see.

I'm not sure where you are coming from with this statement. Although Houston is bad, Carr has been excellent and has the numbers to prove it. I agree with everything the original poster has to say here. It is getting difficult to take the "Watch" articles serious with the obvious oversites. Grossman and Carr should both have been on this list prior to this week. Still waiting on Carr, but Grossman jumps from nowhere to #2 without even a mention that he should of appeared sooner.

This still does not explain the complete absense of Carr in the "Climbing up the ladder" portion of the article. He absolutely should have appeared there at least once if not more times. (Sorry, I did not check to see if Grossman has appeared or not, but he should also be in that section.)

Actually, Carr has not shown up on any "Quarterback Watch" report this season. Not once. And just look at his numbers and consistency. He belongs in the top ten.

Why is David Carr being ignored in the "Quarterback Watch" every week. I believe he is out performing at least half of the people in the top ten yet he is not even getting listed in the "Climbing Up the Ladder" list. What gives?

What do the Cards have to do with the NFC East division?

Sorry lack of sleep. go back to what you were doing.