WorstCoachingEver

What do you need explained? The ref gave a clear and concise explanation of his interpretation of the rules.

Are you really this clueless about your players? Bush didn't light it up the last 2 weeks during McFadden's absence. With McFadden healthy and having played well the first games of the season, he's the feature back.

He could always go into acting:

1. GB challenges Jones fumble at 2:18. With a change of possession, GB had plenty of time to look at replays before wasting a TO on a worthless challenge. 2. GB doesn't let CHI score from 9 yard line with only 1 timeout and 1:44 left in game. Since CHI was too stupid to knee the ball 3x down to :08 seconds, LET Chicago score. 3. CHI doesn't knee the ball on any of the downs inside 10 yard line. This is just dumb. A fumble has to be 3x more likely than a miss from 26 yards. 4. GB doesn't call TO after Forte run on 1st and goal from 9 yard line. Clock goes from 1:44 to :59. If you aren't going to let them score on 1st down, at least call a timeout after the 1st play, anything can happen afterwards. Further proof that NFL coaches have the same Wonderlic scores as their players.

But then I'd have to remove my picture of Jason Garrett! Thanks everyone for the responses.

Saw that. I needed to post my own thread of the actual trades on here to make my argument to him.

Had to bring up some trades to this board to prove to the commish that people outside our league feel his rejections are meritless. Opinions wanted: Standard Performance Scoring 14 teams 9 Starters, 6 Bench Players 1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 FLEX, 1 TE, 1 K, 1 D Trades made this week that got rejected. None involved me: Trade 1 Donovan McNabb and Fred Taylor for LaDanian Tomlinson and Johnny Knox. Reason for denying: Not equal value. Donovan and F Taylor are starting skill players while the other two are #2s at their spot. Trade 2 T.O. and Gaffney for V.Jax Reason for denying: Unequal value for a player not on a team / suspended. I've spoken to the Commish and tried to explain that you can't reject trades because you deem that to be of "unequal value." That's garbage. Trades are hardly ever equal in value as the whole concept of "value" is subjective. I also made the point that you should only reject trades when there is such a gross disparity in the trade (a stud RB like CJ for Gaffney) or there is evidence of collusion. Almost everyone in our league agrees with me (probably because they made the trades too!). Just wanted your opinions. Thanks in advance.

Oh, puh-leeze. Take your panties off and put some boxers on. I'm not laughing at the injury itself, just the fact he was acting like a clown and then this happened.

I'm sorry but I can't help but laugh. This clown had his helmet off all pre-game (with a smug grin on his face) while he donned his blonde hairdo.

OMG, that Romo to Witten to TO was the most improvised play I have ever seen!!!!!

2009 Cowboys Offseason Priorities 1) Clean house in terms of the coaching staff 2) Draft/acquire a legitimate backup QB 3) Draft/acquire a LT 4) Draft/acqurie replacement for Z. Thomas (he's making zero plays) 5) Cut PacMan

I don't think its going to hold up after this performance. The entire coaching staff needs to go.

Someone needs to start up a "Cowboys 2009 Offseason" thread....

True, but I wouldn't hold out much hope for an OAK upset @ TB.

You obviously aren't a lawyer as you just got owned on all points. Do some due diligence for christ sake and you would see you out of your league on the Brees scenario (wasn't throwing when he was signed by NO, sucked when they drafted Rivers). And I never said Romo wouldn't win one as I said he looks like Peyton pre-super bowl win. But you proved you aren't a lawyer with your 2nd grade reading comprehension and lack of debate skills. What's sad is you had to put an emoticon at the end when you GOT OWNED! Good night and good luck.