[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]
Why is Coleman the better back? What makes that a true statement? Last summer Freeman latched on to Steven Jackson during the hard knocks show. It seemed last summer he was a real student of the game and sponge along the Vet RB. I imagine he is exactly a year ahead of Coleman in mental and physical preparation. So how does this make him worse then a rookie who has missed 2 weeks?
My Lineup is pretty stacked. I am 3-0 in a 12 man standard league. I was thinking of moving a combination of DeVonta Freeman and Chris Johnson for Eddie Lacy. But watching Freeman on Sunday he looked explosive and tough. Advice?
I dont think one was available last year. But for many years in the past I was able to download an AWESOME spreadsheet from the forums. Forget who created it, but was wondering if there would possibly be one this year.
Last week there was a post with a free weekly league that if you placed top 50 you won 5 bux. This post is no where to be found now and I cant remember the site that this wa splaye don. Any links?
I just don't know how much value some of these other warmers have on my bench. Is it worth holding onto guys like Justin Hunter and Devante Adams. Or is it better to just hold both of Lynch's backups.
Seattle as a team I think is set to come out of this bye focused. But how does the backfield shake up behind Lynch? Is Turbin still the handcuff to Lynch? Where does Christine fit in? If Marshawn Lynch were to go down this season it seems most likely both would flourish. Is there enough reason to roster all three backs, considering the Seattle situation. As a Lynch owner is having at least one of these backups a necessity?