Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

overworkedirish

Members
  • Posts

    438
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Fan of the
    Dolphins

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Location
    Los Angeles, CA

overworkedirish's Achievements

Huddler

Huddler (2/4)

1

Reputation

  1. In my dynasty league, we do 3 pts for field goals, graduated so 40-49 is +1 (4 total), BUT 50+ is an extra 3 points not 2 (total of 6) because we consider a 50+ kick to be the kicker's equivalent of a TD. Same for a sack+forced fumble on defense, 4+2, 6 points.
  2. Tannehill anyone? Or is he awake by now
  3. Your sugar-laced crybaby tears bring me great joy. You've learned from Brady well.
  4. Why don't you send us a memo when you finish all 243 pages.
  5. First off, let me say I agree with your rhetorical question: Why would you trust them? Brady is a lying, cheating snake. But, speaking diplomatically: Creating a hypothetical of how you believe Ted Wells would have conducted his report had Brady cooperated and the Patriots allowed him a 2nd interview with relevant staff, to me shows that you have no interest in the facts presented, only in the person presenting those facts. I heard Brady has a few free Sundays coming up if you're looking for a good time I won't tell Chip, I promise.
  6. Yeah... as MorningMud and Keggerz said - that's just legalese. Your argument is along the lines of calling evolution "just a theory". Also, Wells made it clear that he was comfortable with Brady's camp going through the phone themself and passing on pertinent phone records - no turning over of the phone necessary. They refused. Smart on Yee's part instead of lying, because if he was caught lying he would lose his license. But the lack of cooperation to provide any information, in the context of phone records of others involved, is indicative of obstruction. Also, you have that backwards. 11 of the balls were underinflated. Not 1.
  7. Obviously the Cowboys' O line is stacked now. But I have to wonder why in the world you would sign on to play for a 35 year old QB?? By the time it's time to restructure, Romo (AND Witten) will be retiring. In this league where finding a starting QB has proven quite difficult. Mark my words, he'll regret this decision. I know I'm bitter because the Fins were so close to convincing him too, but there's a reality to Romo's expiration.
  8. It's my impression that he focused on the early rounds - and blew them - and the scouting staff were the ones good at finding late round talent. He deserves no praise.
  9. Alshon + Ellington would be reasonable for Bell. Don't give up Bernard. Help with mine? http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?/topic/429312-trade-to-dump-brandon-marshall/
  10. Robinson was benched for a fumble I believe. Personally I don't trust that backfield as a starter one bit. Ingram vs. who to start? Help with mine? http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?/topic/429312-trade-to-dump-brandon-marshall/
  11. Reed's matchup is tasty. If Cousins plays, I'd go Reed. Help with mine? http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?/topic/429312-trade-to-dump-brandon-marshall/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information