firstandfive

Unless you have Peterson, McCoy and Charles, you start Lacy. If Mike James can rack up 158 yards rushing on the Seahawks defense, Lacy having at least a halfway decent game isn't out of the question. Don't overthink it

Trust your gut. Do add some reasoning behind that decision as well, non-PPR means you're more dependent on TDs, and Bell should be the one getting all goal line carries. Bell seemed to fare pretty well in week 16 last year

I'd hang on to Greene to use as a trade piece when someone in your league gets desperate for RBs in a couple weeks. Certainly wouldn't drop him for Blue or Richardson. Are those really the only 2 upside options available?

I wouldn't. Because of his recent injury history, I don't trust Foster any more than Martin and I think Edelman is markedly better than Cooper.

There has got to be somebody better than them available. Don't like either unless it's a keeper (in which case, Beckham if I had to choose one of those two).

I would not do it.

I don't think Grimes is a strong handcuff (he'll split time with Blue in the event of a Foster injury), but if you can get Pitta out of the deal I'd do it.

Terrance West. Far more talented and I don't think Hill will truly get as big of a role as is being discussed.

I won't pretend to be knowledgeable on the injury, but I would imagine that's why they classify it in different grades. http://www.coreperformance.com/knowledge/injury-pain/turf-toe.html I would assume that the Eagles would not risk further injury by having him participate in practice, though, since it's not during the season and they could afford to sit him out for now.

I'd go Ellington. Take an RB #1, then go WR-WR at 20-21. Ellington will be better than whatever RB2 is left at 20-21, especially since it's PPR. WR is so deep this year in terms of upside players in the mid rounds.

If it were me, I would try to offer Cruz up first, instead of Floyd. I like Floyd's upside and think Cruz will be very boom or bust this year (possibly with more bust than boom, unfortunately).

Any round values associated or just keep 4 with no other impact? Stafford, Gio, Julio for sure. Then probably Foster just because of how thin RB is bound to be with 48 players kept. You'll be able to draft White, Cruz, or a comparable option in the draft - doubt there will be a running back with more upside than Foster available.

I suppose I didn't look at how bad his WR depth is too. But backing up his RB1 is more valuable to him than a rookie receiver that he'll only play on bye weeks. All I know is I'd much rather be starting Knile Davis than Shonn Greene, Darren McFadden or Danny Woodhead. Really should have just drafted Davis instead of one of those to avoid having to trade. Dubbing this a "bad" trade undermines the importance of handcuffing your RB1, particularly in a situation where there's a clear-cut handcuff.

Considering the fact that you don't have much depth at the RB position, you're in a bad spot if Charles gets hurt. For that reason, I'd take Knile.

I like Johnson over Matthews, but Patterson over Floyd. This one for me would come down to which players you prefer to have. It's pretty even.