Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Hardrocker

Members
  • Posts

    494
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Fan of the
    Redskins

Contact Methods

  • MSN
    Hardrocker
  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Location
    The Thriving Metropolis of Burkeville, VA
  • Interests
    Fantasy Football, Hunting, Farming

Hardrocker's Achievements

Huddler

Huddler (2/4)

0

Reputation

  1. Previous poster is correct. I would do Fitz, but do not know if the family would.....cant really say without seeing both rosters.
  2. Yes. You do not want to give up Mike Wallace and CJ2K.
  3. I would have to agree that while it is a fair offer, I do not think it is a significant upgrade. You wouldn't trade Forte straight up for CJ and while Ryan has been a disappointment, so has RIvers. It is a gut move here really and if you believe in CJ I think you may regret the move later. The other poster said if you really want to move him, move him for a better runner. Good luck.
  4. I would not. Too many questions still around Foster and with Austin out you cant afford to miss anyone else. I would sit tight and hope for Fred Jackson to continue to be one of the most underrated players in FF.
  5. If you can get Rice you get him. Schaub back in the deal too! Yes
  6. I would absolutely do the deal as the Gore owner. I do not see any reason to bail on Brees if I am the Jamal Charles owner. Why give up a hugh piece only to get another RB that is an injury risk. So Yes if I am B. No if I am A.
  7. I would absolutely do the deal as the Gore owner. I do not see any reason to bail on Brees if I am the Jamal Charles owner. Why give up a hugh piece only to get another RB that is an injury risk. So Yes if I am B. No if I am A.
  8. I would absolutely do the deal as the Gore owner. I do not see any reason to bail on Brees if I am the Jamal Charles owner. Why give up a hugh piece only to get another RB that is an injury risk. So Yes if I am B. No if I am A.
  9. Interesting offer. Sounds as if the Nicks owner is afraid he is hurt. If you believe Nicks is healthy it is difficult to say no to this offer. I had Nicks last year and have Stevie this year. If I could I would make the deal. In fairness, the Giants seem off still this year. Plenty of time to come around though. Anyway just my 2 cents.
  10. Emmitt Smith had a pretty good return after a hold out that included some brief time missed during the season, but you are correct that there are not many and I cannot think of any others.
  11. Proper scoring for this in non IDP leagues should be as follows: Meachems touchdown on the "fumble" should be scored to the D/ST and NOT to Meachem. As soon as the interception was made, the Saints were on Defense. So the ensuing fumble and return for touchdown would be points for the D/ST. Look at it another way....if Peyton Manning threw an interception and it was returned for a touchdown...doesnt the D get the score? It really is that simple. Actually the Colts were involved in a similar play several years ago when Manning had a pick and the team fumbled and the Colts scored. Points to D not to the offensive player.
  12. Been away awhile, but must have felt your pain... Mojo sent.
  13. Thoughts and prayers for your dad. I have always considered my dad to be my hero and my greatest hope is that my four kids can one day say the same! Good luck Hardrocker
  14. Thoughts and prayers for you all. Good luck Hardrocker
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information