Apocalypse
6/14/07 2:49pm
The question is: Should we add another flex position to the starting lineup? Yes or No.
Apocalypse
6/14/07 2:49pm
Yes.
bushwacked
6/14/07 3:13pm
No, this is already the flexiest league I've ever played in and starting 1 RB and 5 WRs (which would be possible if we add another flex) approaches a level of goofiness I'm not too fond of.
I feel more strongly about this proposed rule change than any other. I've made offseason trades during the last 2 years to take advantage of the current starting lineup requirments in mind.
No, teams were built around the current lineups.
The Hitter
6/15/07 8:22am
No.
BigMikeinNY
6/16/07 4:16pm
no
No to flex. I'd rather add a 2nd RB
I vote yes. I have a glut of RBs that could fill that role.
bushwacked
6/18/07 3:04pm
QUOTE(leper65 @ 6/17/07 7:09am) [snapback]2065882[/snapback]
I'd rather add a 2nd RB
I'll go with whatever we vote in....but I probably wouldn't have traded both Rudi Johnson and Willis McGahee within a year if I knew we were going to start screwing around with roster requirments after they have been established for 2 seasons.
Apocalypse
6/22/07 3:23pm
The NO's have it.
No new flex position.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.