Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Inactive teams during the season - VOTING Thread.
The Huddle Fantasy Football Forums > League Forums > BoTH Fantasy Football League Forums > DOH!
Big John
There is no current rule on this.

Proposed rule is as follows:



All team owners are expected to remain active during the season. If you are going to be away for a while or might be absent, please indicate to the league of this and when you expect to return. Seeking out and using a temporary team owner during your absence will be encouraged.

If you are absent without explanation and the lineup carried over if less than fully competitive due to starting an injured or bye-week player, the commissioner will track to see if you have returned and if you are still absent and had not been active for ( question 2 ), the commissioner will adjust the lineup to a best lineup (by using Huddle projection sheets), except when facing the commish the rest of the league will solely determine the lineup. If a league member believes a "best lineup" was not submitted by the commish, he can post an objection then the league can submit a consensus "best lineup".

If you are still absent without explanation for ( question 3 ) and made no visit to the league site, the commish will seek out a replacement owner starting out with the waiting list. Once the replacement owner is found, he will take over the team and be the sole owner. No refunds will be given in this case and any winnings will go to the new owner. If no replacement is found by the following weekend, the commish will still set the lineup as discussed in the previous paragraph until a new owner is found.



Question 1 is do you approve this proposal:

A. Yes.

B: No.



Question 2: If Question 1 passes, when shall the commish start setting a "best lineup":

A: the week after an inactive lineup was used

B: 2 weeks after an inactive lineup was used

C: delete this paragraph and have no changes by the commish


Question 3: If question 1 passes, when shall a replacement owner be sought?

A: 2 weeks of unexplained inactivity

B: 4 weeks of unexplained inactivity
Hat Trick
A
B
B
nuke'em ttg
A
A
A
'canes2004
A
B
A
Capt Skinman
A
A
B
Bier Meister
A
A
A
CaP'N GRuNGe
A
A
B

Though with A for the 2nd one, we'd still have a week where no lineup or an incomplete one would be allowed to count?
Big Score 1
1. A

2. A...though with with any of the options of this particular part of the proposed rule change, rule proposal #1 A & #2 A of the Incomplete Lineup Rule are neutered. Not sure how we'd be able to reconcile this contradiction in rules.


3. A
Big John
still need more votes.
Trojanmojo
A
B
B
Big John
Ot the results:

Rule will be put in place.

Question 2, 1 week has the consensus.

question 3, 4-4 tie, I will err on the side of going with the longer period and go with 4 weeks to decide this.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.