Current rules allow for in incomplete lineup. Proposed change is the require a complete lineup. This means you will not be allowed an empty slot in a starting position and no changes later to a "no starter" at any position. Other proposal is for no bye-week player being started unless you have no other option from your roster.

Question 1:

A: Require every slot to be filled for a starting lineup.

B. Allow empty slots to be submitted (current rule)

Question 2:

A: Disallow bye-week players to be submitted unless there is no other options from your roster?

B. Leave current rule of allowing bye-week players to be started

A
B

B

B

That's kind of a cop out.....you can not have someone to start but you can still cover your azs w/ a guy on bye? Last Year I thought I'd shuffle guys with FA so I always had a stater it's early, see if this helps

B
B

A
A

A
A

No games should be played with lineups.

1. A
2. A

Disclaimer for 2. A;

As nuke'em ttg said....

I did the same. With unlimited FA moves, there is absolutely no excuse not to manage your team so as to always have a roster of available starters...especially as we're going down to 12 teams.

The way the this is currently written up for consideration, rule 2. A effectively cancels out rule 1. A.

Kind of pointless IMHO

still need more votes

A
B

1:
A=5
B=2

A: Require every slot to be filled for a starting lineup. - passes

2:
A=4 (including 2 to remove disclaimer, counting nuke as this)
B=4

Since the proposed rule was not liked by half and the disclaimer part not liked by another 2 members, this rule fails to pass. Submitting bye-week players will still be allowed.