Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Need help at WR?
The Huddle Fantasy Football Forums > League Forums > Other Fantasy Football League Forums > Dynasty Warz II
Rovers
Rebuilding... Burelson looks like he conna have a career year. Any offers?
Rovers
I said BURLESON, not Breaston! whacko2.gif
tbimm
Offer made.
Dallas Sooner
QUOTE (Rovers @ 10/3/09 7:26am) *
I said BURLESON, not Breaston! whacko2.gif



LOL< maybe that should tell you something.
Rovers
QUOTE (Dallas Sooner @ 10/3/09 4:03pm) *
LOL< maybe that should tell you something.


It tells me nothing. Burleson has a 2 year contract, and in a 16 team league, he is the #14 WR in scoring this year. At the very least, he is a solid #2 WR in most line ups. He would be your #1 WR if you had him on your roster. You don't have a WR within 10 points of him.

Bureleson isn't trash.... he's the #1 WR for Seattle this year, maybe next year too. In a rebuild mode, why in the world would I want to trade Breaston?

I'd be happy to hold Burelson, no problem with that at all. No one wants the #14 WR in scoring in this league for a playoff run? I'm not going to give the guy away. He has value for ANY playoff contending team in this league, a starter for just about every roster, unless some one has 3 WR's in the top 13 in scoring on their roster. Heck, even Boldin, R Williams, and a bunch of other big name WR's are behind him in points. Bulreson will finish in the top 20.

His price will be commensurate with that top 20, or no problem, I'll keep him! pop.gif
Boomer Sooner
You got about 3 rounds higher than I would even consider for him. I wouldnt start him over TO or Braylon.
Stingers
QUOTE (Rovers @ 10/3/09 3:44pm) *
It tells me nothing. Burleson has a 2 year contract, and in a 16 team league, he is the #14 WR in scoring this year. At the very least, he is a solid #2 WR in most line ups. He would be your #1 WR if you had him on your roster. You don't have a WR within 10 points of him.

Bureleson isn't trash.... he's the #1 WR for Seattle this year, maybe next year too. In a rebuild mode, why in the world would I want to trade Breaston?

I'd be happy to hold Burelson, no problem with that at all. No one wants the #14 WR in scoring in this league for a playoff run? I'm not going to give the guy away. He has value for ANY playoff contending team in this league, a starter for just about every roster, unless some one has 3 WR's in the top 13 in scoring on their roster. Heck, even Boldin, R Williams, and a bunch of other big name WR's are behind him in points. Bulreson will finish in the top 20.

His price will be commensurate with that top 20, or no problem, I'll keep him! pop.gif

I think it was a fair deal for both. I agree that Burleson is the guy in Seattle for now and is definately worth a 2nd rounder. I thought about offering something for him but like Rovers I am rebuilding and it didn't seem to be the right direction for me to go.

Nice trade guys!
tbimm
QUOTE (Stingers @ 10/4/09 3:21am) *
I think it was a fair deal for both. I agree that Burleson is the guy in Seattle for now and is definately worth a 2nd rounder. I thought about offering something for him but like Rovers I am rebuilding and it didn't seem to be the right direction for me to go.

Nice trade guys!

Considering my 2nd ought to be late and I am in a position to win now I had to pull the trigger. Burleson is not the future but he is as good or better than any WR on my team. Addressing my weakness in next years draft does me no good today!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.