Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Making Randall Legal
The Huddle Fantasy Football Forums > League Forums > BoTH Fantasy Football League Forums > Live and Let Dy
WashingtonD
Ok,
So in Randall's rash of waiver drops he made his roster very illegal...remembering that you have to have a one year contract available for any roster spot you are under 20, he should not have been able to drop as many players as he did.

So in light of this I'm doing the following
I'm placing Patrick Cobbs, Rob Bironas, and Tyler Thigpen back on Randall's team each with a 1 year contract.

This gets Randall back to the legal contract limit at 45 years of actual contracts + dead years for 17 players + 3 years of contracts reserved for his empty spots for a total of 48 years of contracts.

I've also asked Randall to run any waiver deals past me first to ensure he doesn't do something like this in the future.

Thanks to the folks that pointed out the problem and my apologies for taking a bit of time to unwind it but it took some doing to trace back all the transactions.

WD
electricrelish
Making Randall Legal

Your subject title sounds like a new feel good film like Chasing Bobby Fisher or Good Will Hunting.
The Champ is Here
wash, should I be at 50 instead of 49? i had 50, dropeed hixon (2) and added coles.
efi4eye
I'm sorry to be the one to say this, but I had a feeling Randall wasn't cut out for this
Randall9991
QUOTE (efi4eye @ 10/27/09 4:28am) *
I'm sorry to be the one to say this, but I had a feeling Randall wasn't cut out for this

Excuse me, But isn't dynasty meaning you win for more than one season at a time. In case you were wondering I was setting my team up for the future. Look at the trades I did. I lost basically both of my qbs. Now I have a starter-who is good, A rookie with the promise to start, a rookie rb who probably will replace the starter in a few years, a nice wr with lots of promise, plus another one in trade hold-by status. I have a full line-up of draft-picks rounds 1 through 5. So I knew I wasn't going to win this season-but I did this exact thing in another league-and guess what that team is now number one in that league. So maybe I am the one who does it right-and youre wrong. Think about the Benson pick-how many of you told me I was wrong to draft him. Now someone wants him-so was I wrong? John The league years is the only thing I didn't understand. I understand dynasty. I want to build a team that can win for more than one season-like maybe two or three in a row, so let me stay and watch me-and see if I can do it. I only need help with contract years.
Randall9991
QUOTE (Randall9991 @ 10/28/09 2:58am) *
Excuse me, But isn't dynasty meaning you win for more than one season at a time. In case you were wondering I was setting my team up for the future. Look at the trades I did. I lost basically both of my qbs. Now I have a starter-who is good, A rookie with the promise to start, a rookie rb who probably will replace the starter in a few years, a nice wr with lots of promise, plus another one in trade hold-by status. I have a full line-up of draft-picks rounds 1 through 5. So I knew I wasn't going to win this season-but I did this exact thing in another league-and guess what that team is now number one in that league. So maybe I am the one who does it right-and youre wrong. Think about the Benson pick-how many of you told me I was wrong to draft him. Now someone wants him-so was I wrong? John The league years is the only thing I didn't understand. I understand dynasty. I want to build a team that can win for more than one season-like maybe two or three in a row, so let me stay and watch me-and see if I can do it. I only need help with contract years.

What about my trade-the years are exactly the same? When will it be processed? John
The Mucca
Yep, that trade should be good to go now.
LordOpie
QUOTE (Randall9991 @ 10/27/09 7:58pm) *
Excuse me, But isn't dynasty meaning you win for more than one season at a time. In case you were wondering I was setting my team up for the future. Look at the trades I did. I lost basically both of my qbs. Now I have a starter-who is good, A rookie with the promise to start, a rookie rb who probably will replace the starter in a few years, a nice wr with lots of promise, plus another one in trade hold-by status. I have a full line-up of draft-picks rounds 1 through 5. So I knew I wasn't going to win this season-but I did this exact thing in another league-and guess what that team is now number one in that league. So maybe I am the one who does it right-and youre wrong. Think about the Benson pick-how many of you told me I was wrong to draft him. Now someone wants him-so was I wrong? John The league years is the only thing I didn't understand. I understand dynasty. I want to build a team that can win for more than one season-like maybe two or three in a row, so let me stay and watch me-and see if I can do it. I only need help with contract years.

clap.gif
The Champ is Here
Randall coming out swinging, i like it.
efi4eye
QUOTE (Randall9991 @ 10/28/09 1:58am) *
Excuse me, But isn't dynasty meaning you win for more than one season at a time. In case you were wondering I was setting my team up for the future. Look at the trades I did. I lost basically both of my qbs. Now I have a starter-who is good, A rookie with the promise to start, a rookie rb who probably will replace the starter in a few years, a nice wr with lots of promise, plus another one in trade hold-by status. I have a full line-up of draft-picks rounds 1 through 5. So I knew I wasn't going to win this season-but I did this exact thing in another league-and guess what that team is now number one in that league. So maybe I am the one who does it right-and youre wrong. Think about the Benson pick-how many of you told me I was wrong to draft him. Now someone wants him-so was I wrong? John The league years is the only thing I didn't understand. I understand dynasty. I want to build a team that can win for more than one season-like maybe two or three in a row, so let me stay and watch me-and see if I can do it. I only need help with contract years.


Hey, that's great man. Prove me wrong. I'm actually impressed that you're participating in the forums now
G.K.Trey
QUOTE (electricrelish @ 10/26/09 4:23pm) *
Making Randall Legal

Your subject title sounds like a new feel good film like Chasing Bobby Fisher or Good Will Hunting.


Starring John Cusack
The Champ is Here
QUOTE (G.K.Trey @ 10/28/09 10:56pm) *
Starring John Cusack


Directed by Quentin Tarantino.
G.K.Trey
QUOTE (The Champ is Here @ 10/28/09 11:23pm) *
Directed by Quentin Tarantino.


I was gonna say John Hughes ( but he's dead , and it makes me feel old)
WashingtonD
I'd actually like to see Quentin Tarantino's take on a feel good movie lol
LordOpie
QUOTE (WashingtonD @ 10/29/09 9:44am) *
I'd actually like to see Quentin Tarantino's take on a feel good movie lol

Inglorious Bastards was a feel good flick and pretty good.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.