Incubus Posted September 1, 2005 Share Posted September 1, 2005 Everywhere I look I see Tatum Bell ranked higher than Michael Anderson. Yet every source I check notes Anderson #1 on the depth chart. Why then is Bell ranked higher? Does everyone think Bell will (eventually) take the #1 spot? If so, how long until he does? Your thoughts please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down The Middle Posted September 1, 2005 Share Posted September 1, 2005 I picked up T Bell - but I am not expecting much (just hoping). Denver has a revolving door of RB's. No one saw the old man taking the #1 RB slot, but it won't last long. IMO it is just a coaching tactic to get T Bell perfoming better and to apprciate the position not take it for granted. To answer your question T Bell will be the #1 RB more times this season than Anderson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin Johnies Posted September 1, 2005 Share Posted September 1, 2005 Anderson has been #1 all summer. He has a better ypc and more touchdowns. He's also a better pass protector. Tatum Bell disciples need to quit lying to themselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down The Middle Posted September 1, 2005 Share Posted September 1, 2005 I hear you JJ - but we can always hope for the best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.