giantsfan Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 Foster and Rogers FOR Anderson As you can see I have Dayne and Bell. I would then start Anderson this week over Edwards with Portis on bye. Rogers is my # 5 WR and I could grab a K-Rob or some other WR off of waivers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pzarvell Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 Sure. I don't know why the other team would do it but sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 Looks like a trade just to trade IMO, but at least you know you have Den's RB sewn up if it isn't total RBBC. Fair, but I think you come out on the butt-end of it; ideally, I'd get something for Dayne and Bell as opposed to picking up Anderson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skrappy1 Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 Fair, but I think you come out on the butt-end of it; ideally, I'd get something for Dayne and Bell as opposed to picking up Anderson. 1009960[/snapback] Exactly what I was thinking on both counts. But if you want to corner the market on Denver RBs and hope that one emerges as yet another stud this season, it's not terrible as both Foster and Rogers have disappointed greatly thus far (though it has only been 2 weeks). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.