aaronvh Posted October 4, 2005 Share Posted October 4, 2005 About 20 minutes ago I traded... I gave Jimmy Smith and Rudi Johnson for... Randy Moss and Marcel Shipp I think this works our great for both teams, especially since JJ is a bust and Shipp will be the main man in Arizona for a while at least. So now I am debating on trying to get Chad Johnson. The guy that has him is really hurting at QB. So here is what I am thinking. Bledsoe, Favre or Plummer and... Steve Smith for Chad Johnson. This would give me CJ, Moss and DJack at my WR spot, it wouldn't do much to me at QB because I still have E. Manning who is looking great IMO. So the question really is would you rather have Steve Smith or Chad Johnson? Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steelhead Posted October 4, 2005 Share Posted October 4, 2005 (edited) That's a tough one. I like CJ alot, I think he will end up top 5 WR. But the Panthers rely more on Smith than the Bengals do on CJ. Palmer also utilizes TJH and now rookie Chris Henry is getting looks. I would almost stick with Smith because he will have more big games, but CJ should be more consistent. Not sure if this helps... See mine http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?showtopic=114967 Edited October 4, 2005 by Steelhead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Rugby Posted October 4, 2005 Share Posted October 4, 2005 Nice job on the first trade. As far as getting CJ, there is not much of a difference. Both receivers have posted almost identical numbers (Smith has 1 more TD) so the question becomes: who will be more consistant the rest of the year. I would lean toward keeping Smith. He is not a bad option, considering the receivers you have. CJ will produce more steady numbers, but Smith has more potential to have the insane game (and a few sucky ones, as well). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhoops Posted October 4, 2005 Share Posted October 4, 2005 Agreed, SSmith will explode on certain weeks while Chad will be more consistant. I do like Chad better in the long run and I think he's worth Smith and your #2/#3 QB. Good Luck and thanks for the reply. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toolman Posted October 4, 2005 Share Posted October 4, 2005 Nice job on the first trade. As far as getting CJ, there is not much of a difference. Both receivers have posted almost identical numbers (Smith has 1 more TD) so the question becomes: who will be more consistant the rest of the year. I would lean toward keeping Smith. He is not a bad option, considering the receivers you have. CJ will produce more steady numbers, but Smith has more potential to have the insane game (and a few sucky ones, as well). 1042009[/snapback] Thanks for responding to my post! I agree with Rugby plus both teams have games coming up against tough defenses I think Cinn has a tougher schedule than the Panthers i would stick with Smith but you really cant go wrong with either guy. Good luck! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaronvh Posted October 4, 2005 Author Share Posted October 4, 2005 Ok, looking into the future here are their schedules when it matters weeks 11-16 Steve Smith... @Chi @Buf Atl Tam @NO Dal Chad Johnson... Ind Bal @Pit Cle @Det Buf If that helps anybody with any advice. I like Smith weeks 11-13 and CJ weeks 14-16. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.