DROCK_IN_CT Posted November 22, 2005 Share Posted November 22, 2005 Who is better in the long run? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BetterOff Posted November 22, 2005 Share Posted November 22, 2005 I'm in the same situation. I am betting on Martin in the shrot run, StL has a nice easy game against Houston and then a decent one against Washington next. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mentobe24 Posted November 22, 2005 Share Posted November 22, 2005 same boat here except I have Brunell who is very inconsistent. I am going to pick up Marten because he has great matchups and great WR, also the Eagles are looking for other QB's now that McNabb is gone. (Including Kordell!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laborer Posted November 22, 2005 Share Posted November 22, 2005 Definitely go with Martin, much more upside. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cre8tiff Posted November 22, 2005 Share Posted November 22, 2005 (edited) We are a total points league and going to the end of the year (all 16 games). I'm thinking McMann (As much as I hate putting faith in a QB named McMahon), cause I don't own Bulger. Edited November 22, 2005 by cre8tiff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down The Middle Posted November 22, 2005 Share Posted November 22, 2005 McMahan - as mentioned before - it worries me that Philly is shopping QB's - I still think he is second to Martin. Martin has plenty of reps and has a healthy rec. core back. I am faced with the same delima and I am going with Martin (Not calling him Jamie because that gay) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scourge Posted November 22, 2005 Share Posted November 22, 2005 Philly is shopping for QBs for depth and nothing more. They need a third QB. McMahon is the starter unless he gets injured or takes a giant.. and I mean GIANT crap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolv Posted November 22, 2005 Share Posted November 22, 2005 Both have favorable schedules the rest of the way, so it comes down to the receiving corps. I'd MUCH rather have my QB passing to Holt/Bruce/Curtis than Brown/Smith/Lewis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gdawg Posted November 22, 2005 Share Posted November 22, 2005 Martin, he is more experienced and has MUCH better weapons at his disposal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpie Posted November 22, 2005 Share Posted November 22, 2005 I like Martin in your situation. McMahan, while looking exciting, will not put up consistant numbers in my opinion. He's been called a poor man's Vick and his fantasy numbers would probably bear that out. Please see my post: http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?showtopic=129834 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantasyfanatic Posted November 22, 2005 Share Posted November 22, 2005 Another vote for Martin. Is there no one else on waivers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down The Middle Posted November 22, 2005 Share Posted November 22, 2005 Another vote for Martin. Is there no one else on waivers? 1167110[/snapback] If its like my 12 team league - the WW is pretty slim. Here are the top week 11 performers: Brooks Dorsey McMahon Boller losman Maddox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantasyfanatic Posted November 22, 2005 Share Posted November 22, 2005 (edited) If its like my 12 team league - the WW is pretty slim. Here are the top week 11 performers: Brooks Dorsey McMahon Boller losman Maddox 1167124[/snapback] I would take Brooks over McNahon or Martin. At least he will be throwing the ball around allot. Edited November 22, 2005 by fantasyfanatic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildbluefan Posted November 22, 2005 Share Posted November 22, 2005 (edited) I have same problem, and with news I just read , will drop BULGER for Martin first and McMahon second ! However , in your case , I might take chance with BROOKS over both ! Should we hold on to BULGER for playoff weeks, or just assume his season is practically over ?? Edited November 22, 2005 by wildbluefan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tboogs Posted November 22, 2005 Share Posted November 22, 2005 More upside with Martin...and the Rams D sucks so they will be forced to throw the rock. see my post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.