Wolverines Fan Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 Respect my fellow Huddlers picks, but the Cincy and Carolina choices surprised me. I thought the Bengals would go DT to shore up the run defense. Carolina does need a tight end, but I thought RB was a bigger need. JMHO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sox Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 Respect my fellow Huddlers picks, but the Cincy and Carolina choices surprised me. I thought the Bengals would go DT to shore up the run defense. Carolina does need a tight end, but I thought RB was a bigger need. JMHO. 1365091[/snapback] There are only two defensive tackles I deem worthy of the 24th pick,and both were off the board.Marvin HAS stated in the past that the defense's biggest need is a dominant pass rusher. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd1 Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 Lendale White sure doesn't look as good in a Cards uni now. Wonder how far White would fall now with Edge in the fold? Indy HAS to be looking RB, don't they? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 Lendale White sure doesn't look as good in a Cards uni now. Wonder how far White would fall now with Edge in the fold? Indy HAS to be looking RB, don't they? 1365309[/snapback] Yup. I wouldn't have taken White for the Cards had Edge signed before my pick. I would have much rather taken Davis, who they'll probably REALLY take now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outshined Posted March 12, 2006 Author Share Posted March 12, 2006 Lendale White sure doesn't look as good in a Cards uni now. Wonder how far White would fall now with Edge in the fold? Indy HAS to be looking RB, don't they? 1365309[/snapback] Once all 32 teams have drafted, lets start this over again... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 I thought this was a two rounder? Might make sense to do a do-over now, with the FA signings though. I was hoping Mangold fell to the Jets in round 2! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolverines Fan Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 There are only two defensive tackles I deem worthy of the 24th pick,and both were off the board.Marvin HAS stated in the past that the defense's biggest need is a dominant pass rusher. 1365152[/snapback] I looked up the DTs, and I think you made a good case here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolverines Fan Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 Once all 32 teams have drafted, lets start this over again... 1365337[/snapback] Yeah, that is probably the best thing to do. I'm in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outshined Posted March 12, 2006 Author Share Posted March 12, 2006 I thought this was a two rounder? Might make sense to do a do-over now, with the FA signings though. I was hoping Mangold fell to the Jets in round 2! 1365477[/snapback] Thats the reason I want to start over. Had Free Agency start when it was supposed to, we would not have this problem.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
budlitebrad Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 Although he can be inconsistent, I still like Gabe Watson in the first round. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 Thats the reason I want to start over. Had Free Agency start when it was supposed to, we would not have this problem.. 1365508[/snapback] I have no problem with a do-over. The draft is all screwed up now anyways. No way AZ takes LenDale White now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mojo20 Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 Outshined, You can count me in for the do-over. I think a lot will change the second time around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 (edited) I have no problem with a do-over. The draft is all screwed up now anyways. No way AZ takes LenDale White now. 1365529[/snapback] I concur 100%, Cap. Edit: Also, Outshined (or whoever's gonna "run") this... could we make it so picks have to come a bit faster? Edited March 12, 2006 by darin3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 Thats the reason I want to start over. Had Free Agency start when it was supposed to, we would not have this problem.. 1365508[/snapback] Fine with me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 I'd like to take the Eagles in the new one....I was gonna take them last time and had a schedule up in the air... I will have the time on the next one... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chargerz Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 Thats the reason I want to start over. Had Free Agency start when it was supposed to, we would not have this problem.. 1365508[/snapback] Okay by me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outshined Posted March 13, 2006 Author Share Posted March 13, 2006 (edited) Outshined,You can count me in for the do-over. I think a lot will change the second time around. 1365537[/snapback] Its not really a do-over, just a "pre free agency mock". There will be new mocks popping up this week once it settles down. I concur 100%, Cap. Edit: Also, Outshined (or whoever's gonna "run") this... could we make it so picks have to come a bit faster? 1365569[/snapback] I am not sure how to speed it up. We were averaging 5 picks per day. I thought that was OK. If anybody has a good idea, please post it. I have said it before, its hard to put a 12 hr window on this because it somebody picks at 7pm - the next pick is due at 7am. I can run the next one, but I can't be here all day to enforce the picks if the 24 hr window rule is reduced. It kind of runs on its own with the 24 hr rule. If somebody else wants to run it with trades, thats fine. I still prefer to do the next one with no trades. (its still too far away from draft day and I really don't know how to run one with trades) We still have plenty of time to do a few of these if everybody is up for them. I will make a new post with the same names and teams for check in. We will start on the mock on Thursday at 7am. Avernus - you will have to work it out with Fitztek on who is drafting. You could probably work together.... Edit: If somebody else wants to run it a different way - let me know, otherwise I will make the new post tommorrow morning for check in. Edited March 13, 2006 by Outshined Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 How about this.... 12 hour limit, with two standby guys. The standby guys have to be pretty well versed on all teams, but they step in if the 12 hour limit goes by? They make the one pick. I think it would be too hard to get a secondary for each team, so does this make any sense? 24 hours is just too long.... it drags the whole thing down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 How about this.... 12 hour limit, with two standby guys. The standby guys have to be pretty well versed on all teams, but they step in if the 12 hour limit goes by? They make the one pick. I think it would be too hard to get a secondary for each team, so does this make any sense? 24 hours is just too long.... it drags the whole thing down. 1365695[/snapback] exactly...I'll be a standby guy lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 exactly...I'll be a standby guy lol 1365703[/snapback] And here I wuz, thinkin you were a stand UP guy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outshined Posted March 13, 2006 Author Share Posted March 13, 2006 How about this.... 12 hour limit, with two standby guys. The standby guys have to be pretty well versed on all teams, but they step in if the 12 hour limit goes by? They make the one pick. I think it would be too hard to get a secondary for each team, so does this make any sense? 24 hours is just too long.... it drags the whole thing down. 1365695[/snapback] Who would be the two standby guys? What if they're not here? I prefer the 24 hr rule. We were almost at 5 picks per day I thought that was OK. We almost finished 1 round in a week, not counting weekends. If you have a faster way of doing it, you can run it because with a 24 hr window, it runs itself and I can't be here to police it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 And here I wuz, thinkin you were a stand UP guy! 1365708[/snapback] :doah: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
budlitebrad Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 How many rounds for this new draft? 3? 4? Full draft maybe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gator Hater Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 I'll take a Mulligan. Except 2 rounds this time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hosler427 Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 I will gladly be a standby guy. I could do a good job filling in on most teams I would say and I am around alot...probably too much Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.