xMRogers Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 not over (game is, but spread isn't - FG range, kick it, onside...and those of us getting 7.5 are happy) Ignore this....dammit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 I guess we will agree to disagree..I saw the arm get pulled back..Was it a mugging ? No..But arm pulled back and tripped warrants a PI call ISMHO It wasn't a total BS call....it was a very questionable call, and those often happen in games. It was bad timing for those of us that didn't care who won. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theeohiostate Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 Romo threw for 309 yards, and 4 TDs, and the INT should have been another TD, that Owens gift wrapped to Al Haris.That is impressive to me. The Dallas pass rush looked solid as well. Just like many players who have success their first game, before there is tape on you. Rogers was solid, but Dallas had a big lead and never gave it up. Right now its a 10 pt lead, and should easily be 17, if TO doesnt give that TD away. But if you are not impressed, Dallas may have to drop the hammer next time. No mention here of Green Bay being without 5 defensive players . That may have more to do with the Dallas offense then Romo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 because it was rigged Actually the comment was more for Randall as we've been busting back and forth. But if you need something to pick on and cry about...yeah sure because it was rigged. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
montster Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 It's 22 divided by 7, right (3.142)? that's an approximation. pi is a circle's circumference divided by its diameter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Ryan Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 not sure it lived up to the hype, but it was entertaining. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 (edited) It's 22 divided by 7, right (3.142)? http://3.141592653589793238462643383279502...0974944592.com/ Edited November 30, 2007 by Big John Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowboyz1 Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 BOY WIN MOVE TO 11-1 AND A PLAYOFF BIRTH BY WEEK 13. OH YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHH PS. That was a bad call but Romo would have drove them down the field anyway. GB couldn't stop us they could only hope to contain us to under 40 points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tosberg34 Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 Well, I'm here to take my lumps. So anyone want to give it to me do it now before I go away... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 not sure it lived up to the hype, but it was entertaining. The only reason GB was in the game is because Dallas can't seem to play without stupid penalties and because TO has hands of stone in the EZ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowboyz1 Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 Oh yeah and Cowboys by 10 was correct! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Ryan Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 No mention here of Green Bay being without 5 defensive players . That may have more to do with the Dallas offense then Romo Romo has been doing this all season. Woodson wouldnt have made that much of a difference the way Dallas was motioning TO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratesownninjas Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 BOY WIN MOVE TO 11-1 AND A PLAYOFF BIRTH BY WEEK 13.OH YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHH PS. That was a bad call but Romo would have drove them down the field anyway. GB couldn't stop us they could only hope to contain us to under 40 points. 1. There were many bad calls. The Harris strip of TO was a joke. The spotting of the Grant rush late in the fourth was a joke. The PI call was a joke. These teams will meet again. Hopefully the Packers can get healthy before they face eachother next. 2. You didn't put up any points, nor did you make any stops. You didn't do anything, the Cowboys did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HowboutthemCowboys Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 No mention here of Green Bay being without 5 defensive players . Curious to know how many yards Dallas had tonight throwing at the great Al Harris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Ryan Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 Well, I'm here to take my lumps. So anyone want to give it to me do it now before I go away... nah, you learned a lesson tonight. Thats the important thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rattsass Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 Romo threw for 309 yards, and 4 TDs, and the INT should have been another TD, that Owens gift wrapped to Al Haris.That is impressive to me. The Dallas pass rush looked solid as well. Just like many players who have success their first game, before there is tape on you. Rogers was solid, but Dallas had a big lead and never gave it up. Right now its a 10 pt lead, and should easily be 17, if TO doesnt give that TD away. But if you are not impressed, Dallas may have to drop the hammer next time. They played good enough to win. But Dallas fans with objectivity (if there are any) leave this game knowing they are NOT vasty superior to Green Bay. I would love to have seen the result of this game with similar Dallas player injuries and replacements, and maybe just one critical call not going against Green Bay. I suspect the results would have been exactly the opposite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratesownninjas Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 Romo has been doing this all season. Woodson wouldnt have made that much of a difference the way Dallas was motioning TO. Patrick Crayton wouldn't have had the night he had, you dense moran. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratesownninjas Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 nah, you learned a lesson tonight. Thats the important thing. I learned that the Packers are better than I thought. With a plethora of injuries they hung in with the feared cowboys all night, on the road. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomper Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 nah, you learned a lesson tonight. Thats the important thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HowboutthemCowboys Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 They played good enough to win. But Dallas fans with objectivity (if there are any) leave this game knowing they are NOT vasty superior to Green Bay. I would love to have seen the result of this game with similar Dallas player injuries and replacements, and maybe just one critical call not going against Green Bay. I suspect the results would have been exactly the opposite. Injuries and bad calls are part of every game every week. Does'nt matter if you're "vastly superior" than anyone. A W is a W. Unless Dallas f's up royally, the NFC goes through Dallas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 They played good enough to win. But Dallas fans with objectivity (if there are any) leave this game knowing they are NOT vasty superior to Green Bay. I would love to have seen the result of this game with similar Dallas player injuries and replacements, and maybe just one critical call not going against Green Bay. I suspect the results would have been exactly the opposite. And I'd like one GB fan to stop blaming the loss on what they erroneously believe to be a bad pass interference call. I also believe had Favre not been hurt that Dallas wins by 20+ points. Dallas had prepared for a pocket passer and when Favre left the game Rodgers came in and sparked the GB offense. Rodgers looked very sharp making good throws and making plays with his feet too. I truly do wish this game had been with both teams at full strength ... Dallas would have still won by 10+. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratesownninjas Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 Injuries and bad calls are part of every game every week. Does'nt matter if you're "vastly superior" than anyone. A W is a W. Unless Dallas f's up royally, the NFC goes through Dallas. Injuries and bad calls are part of the game. That much is true. Your statement is flawed because rarely do you see injuries to an elite pass rushing DE, a shutdown QB, and a 3 time mvp at qb. As far as bad calls, very few times do you see that many critical calls go the wrong way throughout the duration of the game. A win is a win and the cowboys are in the drivers seat for the NFC playoffs, so I'll give you guys your due, but I wouldn't march around with your noses up in the air...(Sarge) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rattsass Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 Man, Packers still not getting an ounce of respect after that gutty performance. I'm going to have to try on a pair of those Dallas blinders some time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Ryan Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 I learned that the Packers are better than I thought. With a plethora of injuries they hung in with the feared cowboys all night, on the road. We must have watched a different game. Dallas led 27-10. They played Rogers differently than Favre, and that was a mistake. But the bottom line they won by 10, and it should have been 17, if TO catches the damn ball. I dont think GB makes it to the NFC Champ game. Wouldnt surprise me if they lost their first game of the post season a bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchoutofwater Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 The people that are saying they think GB had a chance if not for the injuries, I might agree with you if you agree that DAL had a chance against NE without all their injuries on DEF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.