Tommyknocker Posted October 19, 2008 Share Posted October 19, 2008 I'm concerned about Colston in his first start being out of sync so for now I have Welker and Cotch. Would you start Colston? and then who sits?I hate to over think this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigHoss417 Posted October 19, 2008 Share Posted October 19, 2008 Your exactly right dont over think it. I think its risky buisness starting a WR fresh off an injury but its Colston and I still think its a better option than Welker. He just isnt the same without Brady answer mine please http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?showtopic=267062 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chinatown dragons Posted October 19, 2008 Share Posted October 19, 2008 i disagree about welker.....he has been Cassel's safety valve.....he's not going deep to moss (and when he does, it's hit or miss)...he is doing the short, dump off passes to Welker.....i think welker finds the endzone this weekend.... i'd go cotchery as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cool hand luke Posted October 19, 2008 Share Posted October 19, 2008 I'm in two leagues and have Colston in one (with Cotchery)..same problem. I went w/ Colston. Check my post ...need help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelerMurf Posted October 19, 2008 Share Posted October 19, 2008 Colston and Cotchery (for sure). A little risk on Colston but it was a thumb, it's fixed. Best O in the league too! see mine http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?showtopic=267098 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlohalo Posted October 19, 2008 Share Posted October 19, 2008 The two "C's" won't do you wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.